EZBC vs. ARKY
EZBC (Franklin Bitcoin ETF) and ARKY (ARK 21Shares Active Bitcoin Ethereum Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. EZBC is passively managed, while ARKY is actively managed. EZBC charges 0.19%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for ARKY.
Performance
EZBC vs. ARKY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EZBC
- 1D
- -5.96%
- 1M
- -14.30%
- YTD
- -23.26%
- 6M
- -26.35%
- 1Y
- -35.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZBC vs. ARKY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF | -4.10% |
ARKY ARK 21Shares Active Bitcoin Ethereum Strategy ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZBC vs. ARKY — Risk / Return Rank
EZBC
ARKY
EZBC vs. ARKY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) and ARK 21Shares Active Bitcoin Ethereum Strategy ETF (ARKY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EZBC | ARKY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.27 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZBC | ARKY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | — | — |
Drawdowns
EZBC vs. ARKY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZBC drawdown since its inception was -49.37%, which is greater than ARKY's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZBC and ARKY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZBC | ARKY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.37% | 0.00% | -49.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.58% | 0.00% | -46.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.96% | 0.00% | -15.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.26% | — | — |
Volatility
EZBC vs. ARKY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZBC | ARKY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.72% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.80% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.59% | 0.00% | +43.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.07% | 0.00% | +50.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.07% | 0.00% | +50.07% |
EZBC vs. ARKY - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZBC has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKY's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZBC vs. ARKY - Dividend Comparison
Neither EZBC nor ARKY has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, EZBC is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EZBC is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for ARKY.
EZBC and ARKY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZBC and 1.00% for ARKY.
Find the right allocation for EZBC and ARKY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer