PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXXY.DE vs. M9SA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXXY.DE vs. M9SA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXY.DE) and Market Access Rogers International Commodity UCITS ETF (M9SA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXXY.DE achieves a 23.43% return, which is significantly lower than M9SA.DE's 32.08% return. Over the past 10 years, EXXY.DE has underperformed M9SA.DE with an annualized return of 5.66%, while M9SA.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 7.64% annualized return.


EXXY.DE

1D
-1.47%
1M
-3.12%
YTD
23.43%
6M
24.08%
1Y
33.97%
3Y*
11.64%
5Y*
11.46%
10Y*
5.66%

M9SA.DE

1D
-1.46%
1M
-3.15%
YTD
32.08%
6M
32.39%
1Y
39.29%
3Y*
12.05%
5Y*
13.63%
10Y*
7.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXXY.DE vs. M9SA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EXXY.DE
iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (DE)
23.43%3.90%10.13%-10.90%21.43%38.49%-14.34%8.73%-6.18%-12.20%
M9SA.DE
Market Access Rogers International Commodity UCITS ETF
32.08%-4.38%10.96%-8.16%23.00%52.58%-18.26%13.66%-5.52%-10.12%

Correlation

The correlation between EXXY.DE and M9SA.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2007

0.83

The correlation between EXXY.DE and M9SA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXXY.DE vs. M9SA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXXY.DE
EXXY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
EXXY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXXY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXXY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
EXXY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXXY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

M9SA.DE
M9SA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
M9SA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
M9SA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
M9SA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
M9SA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
M9SA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXXY.DE vs. M9SA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXY.DE) and Market Access Rogers International Commodity UCITS ETF (M9SA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EXXY.DEM9SA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.33

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.78

4.36

-0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.41

8.24

+0.17

EXXY.DE vs. M9SA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXXY.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the M9SA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXXY.DE and M9SA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EXXY.DEM9SA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78

1.77

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.70

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.42

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.07

-0.05

Drawdowns

EXXY.DE vs. M9SA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXXY.DE drawdown since its inception was -65.58%, roughly equal to the maximum M9SA.DE drawdown of -68.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXXY.DE and M9SA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXXY.DEM9SA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.58%

-68.53%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-8.98%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.31%

-17.75%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.03%

-27.06%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.54%

-42.54%

+9.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.97%

-5.62%

-11.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.08%

-33.68%

-6.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.03%

4.76%

-0.73%

Volatility

EXXY.DE vs. M9SA.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXY.DE) and Market Access Rogers International Commodity UCITS ETF (M9SA.DE) have volatilities of 5.99% and 6.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXXY.DEM9SA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.99%

6.09%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.80%

19.44%

-2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.98%

22.09%

-3.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.55%

19.25%

-1.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.32%

18.11%

-2.79%

EXXY.DE vs. M9SA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXXY.DE has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than M9SA.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

EXXY.DE vs. M9SA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EXXY.DE nor M9SA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, EXXY.DE and M9SA.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, EXXY.DE is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EXXY.DE is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for M9SA.DE.

EXXY.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity, while M9SA.DE tracks Rogers International Commodity (RICI). They also come from different issuers: iShares and China Post Global. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for EXXY.DE and 0.60% for M9SA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXXY.DE and M9SA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer