PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXXY.DE vs. IWMO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXXY.DE vs. IWMO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXY.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWMO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EXXY.DE is traded in EUR, while IWMO.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IWMO.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EXXY.DE having a 23.43% return and IWMO.L slightly lower at 23.28%. Over the past 10 years, EXXY.DE has underperformed IWMO.L with an annualized return of 5.66%, while IWMO.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.32% annualized return.


EXXY.DE

1D
-1.47%
1M
-3.12%
YTD
23.43%
6M
24.08%
1Y
33.97%
3Y*
11.64%
5Y*
11.46%
10Y*
5.66%

IWMO.L

1D
-0.91%
1M
8.64%
YTD
23.28%
6M
23.71%
1Y
31.62%
3Y*
26.13%
5Y*
14.68%
10Y*
15.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXXY.DE vs. IWMO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EXXY.DE
iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (DE)
23.43%3.90%10.13%-10.90%21.43%38.49%-14.34%8.73%-6.18%-12.20%
IWMO.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
23.28%6.67%39.11%8.60%-12.89%22.67%17.98%30.01%0.66%15.86%

Correlation

The correlation between EXXY.DE and IWMO.L is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2014

0.27

The correlation between EXXY.DE and IWMO.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXXY.DE vs. IWMO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXXY.DE
EXXY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
EXXY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXXY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXXY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
EXXY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXXY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

IWMO.L
IWMO.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
IWMO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWMO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWMO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IWMO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWMO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXXY.DE vs. IWMO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXY.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWMO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EXXY.DEIWMO.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.33

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.78

3.33

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.41

13.02

-4.60

EXXY.DE vs. IWMO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXXY.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the IWMO.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXXY.DE and IWMO.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EXXY.DEIWMO.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78

1.77

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.82

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.85

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.82

-0.80

Drawdowns

EXXY.DE vs. IWMO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXXY.DE drawdown since its inception was -65.58%, which is greater than IWMO.L's maximum drawdown of -31.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXXY.DE and IWMO.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXXY.DEIWMO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.58%

-31.00%

-34.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-9.46%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.31%

-22.71%

+6.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.03%

-22.71%

-5.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.54%

-31.00%

-2.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.97%

-0.91%

-16.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.08%

-5.69%

-34.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.03%

2.42%

+1.61%

Volatility

EXXY.DE vs. IWMO.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXY.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWMO.L) have volatilities of 5.99% and 6.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXXY.DEIWMO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.99%

6.14%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.80%

15.12%

+1.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.98%

17.78%

+1.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.55%

17.95%

-0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.32%

17.99%

-2.67%

EXXY.DE vs. IWMO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXXY.DE has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than IWMO.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

EXXY.DE vs. IWMO.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EXXY.DE nor IWMO.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EXXY.DE and IWMO.L have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IWMO.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IWMO.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for EXXY.DE.

EXXY.DE is categorized as Commodities, while IWMO.L is Momentum. EXXY.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity, while IWMO.L tracks MSCI World Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for EXXY.DE and 0.25% for IWMO.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXXY.DE and IWMO.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer