PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXXW.DE vs. XCS4.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXXW.DE vs. XCS4.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Dow Jones Asia Pacific Select Dividend 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXW.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C (XCS4.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXXW.DE achieves a 13.56% return, which is significantly lower than XCS4.DE's 29.46% return. Over the past 10 years, EXXW.DE has outperformed XCS4.DE with an annualized return of 7.08%, while XCS4.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 4.54% annualized return.


EXXW.DE

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.30%
YTD
13.56%
6M
14.04%
1Y
36.22%
3Y*
18.59%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
7.08%

XCS4.DE

1D
0.72%
1M
6.51%
YTD
29.46%
6M
30.18%
1Y
51.19%
3Y*
7.20%
5Y*
5.01%
10Y*
4.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXXW.DE vs. XCS4.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EXXW.DE
iShares Dow Jones Asia Pacific Select Dividend 50 UCITS ETF (DE)
13.56%15.94%13.25%9.56%4.03%12.54%-18.74%18.28%-10.70%2.63%
XCS4.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C
29.46%-3.83%7.49%-15.52%11.15%6.09%-19.52%11.73%-1.47%17.20%

Correlation

The correlation between EXXW.DE and XCS4.DE is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2011

0.50

The correlation between EXXW.DE and XCS4.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (3 years) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXXW.DE vs. XCS4.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXXW.DE
EXXW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
EXXW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXXW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXXW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
EXXW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXXW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

XCS4.DE
XCS4.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
XCS4.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCS4.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCS4.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
XCS4.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCS4.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXXW.DE vs. XCS4.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Dow Jones Asia Pacific Select Dividend 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXW.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C (XCS4.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EXXW.DEXCS4.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.40

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.69

4.91

+0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.43

14.58

+5.85

EXXW.DE vs. XCS4.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXXW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is comparable to the XCS4.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXXW.DE and XCS4.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EXXW.DEXCS4.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88

2.35

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.28

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.23

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.23

+0.05

Drawdowns

EXXW.DE vs. XCS4.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXXW.DE drawdown since its inception was -66.89%, which is greater than XCS4.DE's maximum drawdown of -45.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXXW.DE and XCS4.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXXW.DEXCS4.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.89%

-45.06%

-21.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.34%

-10.38%

+4.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.10%

-29.85%

+9.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.10%

-34.04%

+13.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.88%

-45.06%

+3.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.21%

-0.16%

-2.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.54%

-15.35%

+3.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.77%

3.50%

-1.73%

Volatility

EXXW.DE vs. XCS4.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Dow Jones Asia Pacific Select Dividend 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXW.DE) is 2.42%, while Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C (XCS4.DE) has a volatility of 5.83%. This indicates that EXXW.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCS4.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXXW.DEXCS4.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

5.83%

-3.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.92%

16.61%

-7.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.53%

21.68%

-9.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.38%

17.74%

-4.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.81%

19.70%

-3.89%

EXXW.DE vs. XCS4.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXXW.DE has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than XCS4.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

EXXW.DE vs. XCS4.DE - Dividend Comparison

EXXW.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, while XCS4.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EXXW.DE
iShares Dow Jones Asia Pacific Select Dividend 50 UCITS ETF (DE)
4.04%4.60%5.32%5.98%7.16%5.56%4.64%5.67%5.04%7.91%4.27%5.52%
XCS4.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EXXW.DE and XCS4.DE have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EXXW.DE is cheaper at 0.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EXXW.DE is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XCS4.DE.

EXXW.DE tracks Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 50, while XCS4.DE tracks MSCI Thailand. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for EXXW.DE and 0.50% for XCS4.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXXW.DE and XCS4.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer