PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXXW.DE vs. EUNJ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXXW.DE vs. EUNJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Dow Jones Asia Pacific Select Dividend 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXW.DE) and iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (EUNJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXXW.DE achieves a 13.56% return, which is significantly higher than EUNJ.DE's 8.50% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EXXW.DE having a 7.08% annualized return and EUNJ.DE not far behind at 7.05%.


EXXW.DE

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.30%
YTD
13.56%
6M
14.04%
1Y
36.22%
3Y*
18.59%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
7.08%

EUNJ.DE

1D
-0.88%
1M
0.07%
YTD
8.50%
6M
9.89%
1Y
13.18%
3Y*
9.84%
5Y*
5.36%
10Y*
7.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXXW.DE vs. EUNJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EXXW.DE
iShares Dow Jones Asia Pacific Select Dividend 50 UCITS ETF (DE)
13.56%15.94%13.25%9.56%4.03%12.54%-18.74%18.28%-10.70%2.63%
EUNJ.DE
iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist)
8.50%6.56%11.50%1.85%-1.18%12.54%-3.43%21.23%-6.37%10.31%

Correlation

The correlation between EXXW.DE and EUNJ.DE is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2009

0.81

The correlation between EXXW.DE and EUNJ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXXW.DE vs. EUNJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXXW.DE
EXXW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
EXXW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXXW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXXW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
EXXW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXXW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

EUNJ.DE
EUNJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
EUNJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXXW.DE vs. EUNJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Dow Jones Asia Pacific Select Dividend 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXW.DE) and iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (EUNJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EXXW.DEEUNJ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.20

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.69

2.14

+3.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.43

6.18

+14.24

EXXW.DE vs. EUNJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXXW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is higher than the EUNJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXXW.DE and EUNJ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EXXW.DEEUNJ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88

1.14

+1.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.36

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.42

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.35

-0.06

Drawdowns

EXXW.DE vs. EUNJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXXW.DE drawdown since its inception was -66.89%, which is greater than EUNJ.DE's maximum drawdown of -36.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXXW.DE and EUNJ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXXW.DEEUNJ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.89%

-36.95%

-29.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.34%

-6.13%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.10%

-20.39%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.10%

-20.39%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.88%

-36.95%

-4.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.21%

-2.02%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.54%

-6.94%

-4.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.77%

2.13%

-0.36%

Volatility

EXXW.DE vs. EUNJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Dow Jones Asia Pacific Select Dividend 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXW.DE) is 2.42%, while iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (EUNJ.DE) has a volatility of 3.04%. This indicates that EXXW.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUNJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXXW.DEEUNJ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

3.04%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.92%

8.80%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.53%

11.57%

+0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.38%

14.61%

-1.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.81%

16.54%

-0.73%

EXXW.DE vs. EUNJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXXW.DE has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than EUNJ.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

EXXW.DE vs. EUNJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

EXXW.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, more than EUNJ.DE's 2.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUNJ.DE
iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist)
2.46%2.95%3.35%3.56%3.92%2.79%2.64%3.52%3.78%3.41%3.31%3.34%
EXXW.DE
iShares Dow Jones Asia Pacific Select Dividend 50 UCITS ETF (DE)
4.04%4.60%5.32%5.98%7.16%5.56%4.64%5.67%5.04%7.91%4.27%5.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


EXXW.DE and EUNJ.DE have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EXXW.DE is cheaper at 0.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EXXW.DE is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EUNJ.DE.

EXXW.DE tracks Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 50, while EUNJ.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for EXXW.DE and 0.60% for EUNJ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXXW.DE and EUNJ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer