EXXU.DE vs. M9SV.DE
EXXU.DE (iShares Dow Jones China Offshore 50 UCITS ETF (DE)) and M9SV.DE (Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR) are both China Equities funds - EXXU.DE tracks the Dow Jones China Offshore 50 while M9SV.DE tracks the STOXX China A 900 Minimum Variance Unconstrained AM Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EXXU.DE returned -4.06%/yr vs 4.59%/yr for M9SV.DE. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EXXU.DE charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for M9SV.DE.
Performance
EXXU.DE vs. M9SV.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXXU.DE achieves a -6.42% return, which is significantly lower than M9SV.DE's -3.03% return.
EXXU.DE
- 1D
- 3.67%
- 1M
- 7.49%
- 6M
- -8.25%
- YTD
- -6.42%
- 1Y
- -6.12%
- 3Y*
- 7.99%
- 5Y*
- -4.06%
- 10Y*
- 2.51%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.22%
M9SV.DE
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -1.51%
- 6M
- -4.31%
- YTD
- -3.03%
- 1Y
- 3.49%
- 3Y*
- 7.72%
- 5Y*
- 4.59%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.24%
EXXU.DE vs. M9SV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXXU.DE iShares Dow Jones China Offshore 50 UCITS ETF (DE) | -6.42% | 12.84% | 26.47% | -12.23% | -14.38% | -22.83% | 15.84% | 25.95% | -22.64% |
M9SV.DE Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR | -3.03% | -5.32% | 37.47% | 2.90% | -11.14% | 18.00% | 14.68% | 7.74% | -16.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between EXXU.DE and M9SV.DE is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2018 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EXXU.DE vs. M9SV.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EXXU.DE
M9SV.DE
EXXU.DE vs. M9SV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Dow Jones China Offshore 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXU.DE) and Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR (M9SV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EXXU.DE | M9SV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.06 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.24 | 0.48 | -0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.52 | 1.07 | -1.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EXXU.DE vs. M9SV.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXXU.DE drawdown since its inception was -66.04%, which is greater than M9SV.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXXU.DE and M9SV.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXXU.DE | M9SV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.04% | -23.79% | -42.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.04% | -7.28% | -17.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.04% | -23.79% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.29% | -23.79% | -22.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.45% | -16.54% | -20.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.30% | -9.53% | -17.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.80% | 3.25% | +8.55% |
Volatility
EXXU.DE vs. M9SV.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Dow Jones China Offshore 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXU.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.53% compared to Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR (M9SV.DE) at 3.80%. This indicates that EXXU.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than M9SV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EXXU.DE | M9SV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.53% | 3.80% | +3.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.67% | 7.48% | +7.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.13% | 11.08% | +9.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.09% | 20.43% | +10.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.18% | 21.48% | +5.70% |
EXXU.DE vs. M9SV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXXU.DE has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than M9SV.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
EXXU.DE vs. M9SV.DE - Dividend Comparison
EXXU.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, while M9SV.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXXU.DE iShares Dow Jones China Offshore 50 UCITS ETF (DE) | 4.28% | 4.28% | 1.95% | 2.31% | 2.04% | 0.97% | 1.32% | 1.66% | 0.62% | 2.12% | 4.23% | 2.75% |
M9SV.DE Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EXXU.DE and M9SV.DE have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, M9SV.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
M9SV.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for EXXU.DE.
EXXU.DE tracks Dow Jones China Offshore 50, while M9SV.DE tracks STOXX China A 900 Minimum Variance Unconstrained AM Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Market Access. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for EXXU.DE and 0.45% for M9SV.DE.
Find the right allocation for EXXU.DE and M9SV.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer