PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXXU.DE vs. CNIE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXXU.DE vs. CNIE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Dow Jones China Offshore 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXU.DE) and VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CNIE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXXU.DE achieves a -8.32% return, which is significantly lower than CNIE.DE's -3.41% return.


EXXU.DE

1D
-0.26%
1M
-4.32%
YTD
-8.32%
6M
-11.19%
1Y
-5.50%
3Y*
6.92%
5Y*
-5.15%
10Y*
3.37%

CNIE.DE

1D
-0.76%
1M
-2.69%
YTD
-3.41%
6M
-4.66%
1Y
6.66%
3Y*
-0.19%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXXU.DE vs. CNIE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EXXU.DE
iShares Dow Jones China Offshore 50 UCITS ETF (DE)
-8.32%12.86%26.45%-11.75%-14.54%-7.28%
CNIE.DE
VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A
-3.41%8.76%7.28%-12.40%-22.84%8.74%

Correlation

The correlation between EXXU.DE and CNIE.DE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2021

0.70

The correlation between EXXU.DE and CNIE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXXU.DE vs. CNIE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXXU.DE
EXXU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
EXXU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXXU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXXU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
EXXU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXXU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

CNIE.DE
CNIE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
CNIE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNIE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNIE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
CNIE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNIE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXXU.DE vs. CNIE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Dow Jones China Offshore 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXU.DE) and VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CNIE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EXXU.DECNIE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.08

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.25

0.53

-0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.53

1.17

-1.69

EXXU.DE vs. CNIE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXXU.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is lower than the CNIE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXXU.DE and CNIE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EXXU.DECNIE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

0.42

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

-0.16

+0.34

Drawdowns

EXXU.DE vs. CNIE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXXU.DE drawdown since its inception was -66.04%, which is greater than CNIE.DE's maximum drawdown of -45.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXXU.DE and CNIE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXXU.DECNIE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.04%

-45.69%

-20.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.30%

-12.45%

-6.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.14%

-29.20%

+5.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.39%

-25.25%

-13.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.60%

-24.67%

-1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.26%

5.70%

+3.56%

Volatility

EXXU.DE vs. CNIE.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Dow Jones China Offshore 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXU.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CNIE.DE) at 4.49%. This indicates that EXXU.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNIE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXXU.DECNIE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.20%

4.49%

+2.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.69%

10.68%

+3.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.52%

16.04%

+3.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.10%

24.27%

+6.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.23%

24.27%

+2.96%

EXXU.DE vs. CNIE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXXU.DE has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than CNIE.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

EXXU.DE vs. CNIE.DE - Dividend Comparison

EXXU.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, while CNIE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNIE.DE
VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EXXU.DE
iShares Dow Jones China Offshore 50 UCITS ETF (DE)
4.69%4.28%1.95%2.92%2.04%0.96%1.32%1.66%2.07%2.12%4.23%2.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


EXXU.DE and CNIE.DE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CNIE.DE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CNIE.DE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for EXXU.DE.

EXXU.DE tracks Dow Jones China Offshore 50, while CNIE.DE tracks MarketGrader New China ESG. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for EXXU.DE and 0.60% for CNIE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXXU.DE and CNIE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer