PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXSD.DE vs. XB4A.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXSD.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares STOXX Europe Mid 200 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXSD.DE) and Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXSD.DE achieves a 12.15% return, which is significantly lower than XB4A.DE's 26.47% return. Over the past 10 years, EXSD.DE has underperformed XB4A.DE with an annualized return of 9.23%, while XB4A.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 15.98% annualized return.


EXSD.DE

1D
0.64%
1M
4.72%
6M
11.00%
YTD
12.15%
1Y
19.01%
3Y*
14.97%
5Y*
6.68%
10Y*
9.23%

XB4A.DE

1D
1.02%
1M
8.17%
6M
25.41%
YTD
26.47%
1Y
51.75%
3Y*
31.70%
5Y*
17.96%
10Y*
15.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXSD.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EXSD.DE
iShares STOXX Europe Mid 200 UCITS ETF (DE)
12.15%20.71%5.80%15.08%-18.91%18.43%0.93%29.02%-11.97%16.29%
XB4A.DE
Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc)
26.47%51.29%11.01%14.27%-16.45%42.39%-10.86%19.79%-17.99%32.88%

Correlation

The correlation between EXSD.DE and XB4A.DE is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2011

0.72

The correlation between EXSD.DE and XB4A.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc)

Return for Risk

EXSD.DE vs. XB4A.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXSD.DE
EXSD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
EXSD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXSD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXSD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
EXSD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXSD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

XB4A.DE
XB4A.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
XB4A.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XB4A.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
XB4A.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
XB4A.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
XB4A.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXSD.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares STOXX Europe Mid 200 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXSD.DE) and Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EXSD.DEXB4A.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.50

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

4.73

-2.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.63

16.12

-8.49

EXSD.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXSD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the XB4A.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXSD.DE and XB4A.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EXSD.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXSD.DE drawdown since its inception was -61.46%, which is greater than XB4A.DE's maximum drawdown of -53.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXSD.DE and XB4A.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXSD.DEXB4A.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.46%

-53.54%

-7.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.81%

-10.88%

+2.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.39%

-16.26%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.21%

-32.50%

+2.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.16%

-53.54%

+14.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.54%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.65%

-9.90%

-2.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

3.20%

-0.71%

Volatility

EXSD.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares STOXX Europe Mid 200 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXSD.DE) is 3.57%, while Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE) has a volatility of 6.08%. This indicates that EXSD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XB4A.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXSD.DEXB4A.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

6.08%

-2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.49%

14.73%

-4.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.90%

17.53%

-4.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.70%

19.15%

-3.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.70%

20.21%

-3.51%

EXSD.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXSD.DE has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than XB4A.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EXSD.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Dividend Comparison

EXSD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, while XB4A.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EXSD.DE
iShares STOXX Europe Mid 200 UCITS ETF (DE)
2.71%3.08%3.23%2.71%3.06%2.12%1.54%2.85%3.02%3.28%3.16%2.64%
XB4A.DE
Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EXSD.DE and XB4A.DE have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EXSD.DE is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EXSD.DE is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XB4A.DE.

EXSD.DE tracks STOXX Europe Mid 200 Index, while XB4A.DE tracks ATX Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for EXSD.DE and 0.25% for XB4A.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXSD.DE and XB4A.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer