EXSB.DE vs. IBCJ.DE
EXSB.DE (iShares DivDAX UCITS ETF (DE)) and IBCJ.DE (iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds from iShares - EXSB.DE tracks the DivDAX® while IBCJ.DE tracks the MSCI Poland. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EXSB.DE returned 7.59%/yr vs 9.17%/yr for IBCJ.DE. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EXSB.DE charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for IBCJ.DE.
Performance
EXSB.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXSB.DE achieves a 1.54% return, which is significantly lower than IBCJ.DE's 16.30% return. Over the past 10 years, EXSB.DE has underperformed IBCJ.DE with an annualized return of 7.59%, while IBCJ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.17% annualized return.
EXSB.DE
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- 1.54%
- 6M
- 3.75%
- 1Y
- 8.12%
- 3Y*
- 9.41%
- 5Y*
- 5.53%
- 10Y*
- 7.59%
IBCJ.DE
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- 16.30%
- 6M
- 26.50%
- 1Y
- 40.90%
- 3Y*
- 29.89%
- 5Y*
- 14.80%
- 10Y*
- 9.17%
EXSB.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXSB.DE iShares DivDAX UCITS ETF (DE) | 1.54% | 21.72% | 4.26% | 17.02% | -11.05% | 13.58% | 2.20% | 23.19% | -16.62% | 13.85% |
IBCJ.DE iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 16.30% | 53.66% | -0.42% | 43.86% | -21.74% | 14.34% | -18.69% | -3.73% | -9.07% | 35.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between EXSB.DE and IBCJ.DE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2011 | 0.55 |
The correlation between EXSB.DE and IBCJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EXSB.DE vs. IBCJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EXSB.DE
IBCJ.DE
EXSB.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares DivDAX UCITS ETF (DE) (EXSB.DE) and iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EXSB.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.28 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 3.90 | -3.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.26 | 9.60 | -7.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EXSB.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 1.65 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.55 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.36 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.15 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
EXSB.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXSB.DE drawdown since its inception was -60.17%, which is greater than IBCJ.DE's maximum drawdown of -56.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXSB.DE and IBCJ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXSB.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.17% | -56.11% | -4.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.88% | -9.96% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.89% | -18.47% | +2.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.49% | -47.31% | +21.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.68% | -56.11% | +14.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.13% | -1.16% | -3.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.25% | -19.38% | +7.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.58% | 4.05% | -0.47% |
Volatility
EXSB.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares DivDAX UCITS ETF (DE) (EXSB.DE) is 3.57%, while iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCJ.DE) has a volatility of 7.13%. This indicates that EXSB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBCJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EXSB.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.57% | 7.13% | -3.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.51% | 17.61% | -6.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.64% | 23.48% | -8.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 26.72% | -9.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 25.15% | -6.50% |
EXSB.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXSB.DE has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than IBCJ.DE's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
EXSB.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Dividend Comparison
EXSB.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, while IBCJ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXSB.DE iShares DivDAX UCITS ETF (DE) | 3.06% | 3.11% | 3.50% | 4.55% | 3.19% | 2.17% | 2.19% | 2.36% | 2.77% | 1.65% | 2.53% | 3.23% |
IBCJ.DE iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EXSB.DE and IBCJ.DE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EXSB.DE is cheaper at 0.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EXSB.DE is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IBCJ.DE.
EXSB.DE tracks DivDAX®, while IBCJ.DE tracks MSCI Poland. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for EXSB.DE and 0.74% for IBCJ.DE.
Find the right allocation for EXSB.DE and IBCJ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer