PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXS2.DE vs. PR1Z.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXS2.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares TecDAX UCITS ETF (DE) (EXS2.DE) and Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1Z.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXS2.DE achieves a 15.70% return, which is significantly higher than PR1Z.DE's 9.20% return.


EXS2.DE

1D
0.52%
1M
10.51%
YTD
15.70%
6M
16.91%
1Y
6.46%
3Y*
8.54%
5Y*
3.72%
10Y*
9.01%

PR1Z.DE

1D
0.53%
1M
4.73%
YTD
9.20%
6M
11.17%
1Y
19.02%
3Y*
16.35%
5Y*
10.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXS2.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EXS2.DE
iShares TecDAX UCITS ETF (DE)
15.70%5.33%1.63%13.54%-26.00%21.07%6.12%15.72%
PR1Z.DE
Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D)
9.20%24.78%9.45%19.43%-12.46%27.38%-4.61%22.45%

Correlation

The correlation between EXS2.DE and PR1Z.DE is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2019

0.72

The correlation between EXS2.DE and PR1Z.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXS2.DE vs. PR1Z.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXS2.DE
EXS2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
EXS2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXS2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXS2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
EXS2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXS2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

PR1Z.DE
PR1Z.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
PR1Z.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PR1Z.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PR1Z.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
PR1Z.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
PR1Z.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXS2.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares TecDAX UCITS ETF (DE) (EXS2.DE) and Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1Z.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EXS2.DEPR1Z.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.24

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

1.84

-1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.80

6.79

-5.99

EXS2.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXS2.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the PR1Z.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXS2.DE and PR1Z.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EXS2.DEPR1Z.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

1.30

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.66

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.65

-0.51

Drawdowns

EXS2.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXS2.DE drawdown since its inception was -84.49%, which is greater than PR1Z.DE's maximum drawdown of -39.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXS2.DE and PR1Z.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXS2.DEPR1Z.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.49%

-39.52%

-44.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.12%

-10.29%

-5.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.93%

-15.66%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.97%

-24.19%

-10.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-0.41%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.46%

-5.61%

-33.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.07%

2.79%

+5.28%

Volatility

EXS2.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares TecDAX UCITS ETF (DE) (EXS2.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.29% compared to Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1Z.DE) at 4.59%. This indicates that EXS2.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PR1Z.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXS2.DEPR1Z.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.29%

4.59%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.25%

11.98%

+2.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.83%

14.52%

+3.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.80%

16.26%

+2.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.47%

18.63%

+0.84%

EXS2.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXS2.DE has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than PR1Z.DE's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

EXS2.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Dividend Comparison

EXS2.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PR1Z.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EXS2.DE
iShares TecDAX UCITS ETF (DE)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.04%0.15%0.25%0.36%
PR1Z.DE
Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D)
2.31%2.53%2.77%2.80%3.09%1.83%2.11%2.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EXS2.DE and PR1Z.DE have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PR1Z.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PR1Z.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for EXS2.DE.

EXS2.DE tracks TecDAX®, while PR1Z.DE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Eurozone Large & Mid Cap. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for EXS2.DE and 0.05% for PR1Z.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXS2.DE and PR1Z.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer