PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXI3.DE vs. UIMP.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXI3.DE vs. UIMP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Dow Jones Industrial Average UCITS ETF (DE) (EXI3.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXI3.DE achieves a 11.81% return, which is significantly lower than UIMP.DE's 15.73% return. Over the past 10 years, EXI3.DE has underperformed UIMP.DE with an annualized return of 12.50%, while UIMP.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 14.71% annualized return.


EXI3.DE

1D
0.76%
1M
5.20%
YTD
11.81%
6M
12.38%
1Y
25.09%
3Y*
15.05%
5Y*
10.67%
10Y*
12.50%

UIMP.DE

1D
-0.18%
1M
3.59%
YTD
15.73%
6M
16.07%
1Y
25.88%
3Y*
16.74%
5Y*
11.85%
10Y*
14.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXI3.DE vs. UIMP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EXI3.DE
iShares Dow Jones Industrial Average UCITS ETF (DE)
11.81%1.62%20.65%11.22%-3.01%31.25%-2.14%27.50%-1.13%11.26%
UIMP.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
15.73%-1.33%25.94%27.84%-21.40%43.23%10.69%33.09%0.15%7.18%

Correlation

The correlation between EXI3.DE and UIMP.DE is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2011

0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between EXI3.DE and UIMP.DE has dropped to 0.63 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXI3.DE vs. UIMP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXI3.DE
EXI3.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
EXI3.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXI3.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXI3.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
EXI3.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXI3.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

UIMP.DE
UIMP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
UIMP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UIMP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
UIMP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
UIMP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
UIMP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXI3.DE vs. UIMP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Dow Jones Industrial Average UCITS ETF (DE) (EXI3.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EXI3.DEUIMP.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.33

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

2.73

+0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.48

8.82

+2.66

EXI3.DE vs. UIMP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXI3.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the UIMP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXI3.DE and UIMP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EXI3.DE vs. UIMP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXI3.DE drawdown since its inception was -54.00%, which is greater than UIMP.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXI3.DE and UIMP.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXI3.DEUIMP.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.00%

-33.37%

-20.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.50%

-9.42%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.22%

-24.74%

+3.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.22%

-24.74%

+3.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.35%

-33.37%

-2.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.31%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.66%

-8.06%

-1.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

2.93%

-0.75%

Volatility

EXI3.DE vs. UIMP.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Dow Jones Industrial Average UCITS ETF (DE) (EXI3.DE) is 3.20%, while UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMP.DE) has a volatility of 4.04%. This indicates that EXI3.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UIMP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXI3.DEUIMP.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.20%

4.04%

-0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.05%

10.01%

-0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.90%

13.63%

-0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.25%

16.59%

-2.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.12%

16.87%

-0.75%

EXI3.DE vs. UIMP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXI3.DE has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than UIMP.DE's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

EXI3.DE vs. UIMP.DE - Dividend Comparison

EXI3.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, more than UIMP.DE's 0.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EXI3.DE
iShares Dow Jones Industrial Average UCITS ETF (DE)
0.59%0.63%0.75%0.91%0.93%0.67%1.08%1.06%0.73%1.23%1.43%1.95%
UIMP.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.41%0.82%0.70%0.75%0.92%0.62%0.90%0.97%1.03%1.25%1.26%1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


EXI3.DE and UIMP.DE have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UIMP.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UIMP.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for EXI3.DE.

EXI3.DE tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average, while UIMP.DE tracks MSCI USA SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for EXI3.DE and 0.22% for UIMP.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXI3.DE and UIMP.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer