PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXI2.DE vs. CSY9.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXI2.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Dow Jones Global Titans 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXI2.DE) and CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXI2.DE achieves a 12.23% return, which is significantly higher than CSY9.DE's 3.19% return.


EXI2.DE

1D
-0.27%
1M
5.25%
YTD
12.23%
6M
12.47%
1Y
34.12%
3Y*
22.85%
5Y*
17.19%
10Y*
16.14%

CSY9.DE

1D
0.16%
1M
2.99%
YTD
3.19%
6M
3.34%
1Y
3.09%
3Y*
6.65%
5Y*
6.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXI2.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EXI2.DE
iShares Dow Jones Global Titans 50 UCITS ETF (DE)
12.23%10.38%38.84%33.44%-21.53%35.62%10.98%
CSY9.DE
CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD
3.19%-0.67%16.05%5.76%-5.25%23.30%2.67%

Correlation

The correlation between EXI2.DE and CSY9.DE is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2020

0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between EXI2.DE and CSY9.DE has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXI2.DE vs. CSY9.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXI2.DE
EXI2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
EXI2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXI2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXI2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
EXI2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXI2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

CSY9.DE
CSY9.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
CSY9.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSY9.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSY9.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
CSY9.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSY9.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXI2.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Dow Jones Global Titans 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXI2.DE) and CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EXI2.DECSY9.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.07

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.21

0.69

+3.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.84

1.54

+14.30

EXI2.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXI2.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the CSY9.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXI2.DE and CSY9.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EXI2.DECSY9.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

0.38

+2.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

0.51

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.61

-0.20

Drawdowns

EXI2.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXI2.DE drawdown since its inception was -59.21%, which is greater than CSY9.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXI2.DE and CSY9.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXI2.DECSY9.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.21%

-13.92%

-45.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.07%

-4.48%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.75%

-13.92%

-10.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.75%

-13.92%

-10.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-2.72%

+1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.44%

-3.70%

-13.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

2.00%

+0.15%

Volatility

EXI2.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Dow Jones Global Titans 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXI2.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.46% compared to CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE) at 2.09%. This indicates that EXI2.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSY9.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXI2.DECSY9.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

2.09%

+1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.18%

5.48%

+3.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.50%

8.07%

+5.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.60%

12.03%

+4.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.57%

11.91%

+4.66%

EXI2.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXI2.DE has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than CSY9.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

EXI2.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Dividend Comparison

EXI2.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, while CSY9.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSY9.DE
CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EXI2.DE
iShares Dow Jones Global Titans 50 UCITS ETF (DE)
0.33%0.41%0.42%0.61%0.84%0.55%0.99%1.28%1.29%2.56%1.77%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


EXI2.DE and CSY9.DE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSY9.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSY9.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for EXI2.DE.

EXI2.DE tracks Dow Jones Global Titans 50, while CSY9.DE tracks MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Credit Suisse. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for EXI2.DE and 0.25% for CSY9.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXI2.DE and CSY9.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer