PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXHC.DE vs. XCS2.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXHC.DE vs. XCS2.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares eb.rexx Government Germany 2.5-5.5yr UCITS ETF (DE) (EXHC.DE) and Xtrackers II Australia Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XCS2.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXHC.DE achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than XCS2.DE's 8.74% return. Over the past 10 years, EXHC.DE has underperformed XCS2.DE with an annualized return of -0.63%, while XCS2.DE has yielded a comparatively higher -0.09% annualized return.


EXHC.DE

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.67%
6M
0.42%
YTD
0.37%
1Y
0.40%
3Y*
2.33%
5Y*
-0.87%
10Y*
-0.63%

XCS2.DE

1D
0.64%
1M
0.17%
6M
8.57%
YTD
8.74%
1Y
9.20%
3Y*
2.45%
5Y*
-1.91%
10Y*
-0.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXHC.DE vs. XCS2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EXHC.DE
iShares eb.rexx Government Germany 2.5-5.5yr UCITS ETF (DE)
0.37%1.16%1.57%4.17%-10.23%-1.37%-0.09%-0.18%0.47%-1.24%
XCS2.DE
Xtrackers II Australia Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
8.74%-2.17%-1.70%0.78%-13.88%-0.26%4.13%9.65%-0.82%-2.48%

Correlation

The correlation between EXHC.DE and XCS2.DE is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2010

0.30

The correlation between EXHC.DE and XCS2.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.50 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXHC.DE vs. XCS2.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXHC.DE
EXHC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
EXHC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXHC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXHC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
EXHC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXHC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

XCS2.DE
XCS2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
XCS2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCS2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCS2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
XCS2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCS2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXHC.DE vs. XCS2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares eb.rexx Government Germany 2.5-5.5yr UCITS ETF (DE) (EXHC.DE) and Xtrackers II Australia Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XCS2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EXHC.DEXCS2.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.19

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.19

2.01

-1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.46

6.68

-6.22

EXHC.DE vs. XCS2.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXHC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the XCS2.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXHC.DE and XCS2.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EXHC.DE vs. XCS2.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXHC.DE drawdown since its inception was -14.39%, smaller than the maximum XCS2.DE drawdown of -41.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXHC.DE and XCS2.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXHC.DEXCS2.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.39%

-41.58%

+27.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.06%

-4.56%

+2.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.33%

-12.00%

+9.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.55%

-22.36%

+9.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.39%

-41.58%

+27.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.78%

-32.78%

+26.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.90%

-25.75%

+22.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

1.37%

-0.50%

Volatility

EXHC.DE vs. XCS2.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares eb.rexx Government Germany 2.5-5.5yr UCITS ETF (DE) (EXHC.DE) is 0.52%, while Xtrackers II Australia Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XCS2.DE) has a volatility of 2.20%. This indicates that EXHC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCS2.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXHC.DEXCS2.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.52%

2.20%

-1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.06%

7.40%

-5.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39%

8.80%

-6.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.59%

10.13%

-6.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.76%

21.02%

-18.26%

EXHC.DE vs. XCS2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXHC.DE has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than XCS2.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EXHC.DE vs. XCS2.DE - Dividend Comparison

EXHC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, while XCS2.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EXHC.DE
iShares eb.rexx Government Germany 2.5-5.5yr UCITS ETF (DE)
1.40%1.38%1.11%0.81%0.41%0.68%0.86%1.08%0.91%1.34%1.65%1.82%
XCS2.DE
Xtrackers II Australia Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EXHC.DE and XCS2.DE have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EXHC.DE is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EXHC.DE is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XCS2.DE.

EXHC.DE tracks eb.rexx Government Germany 2.5-5.5 Index, while XCS2.DE tracks FTSE Australian Government Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for EXHC.DE and 0.25% for XCS2.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXHC.DE and XCS2.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer