PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXHC.DE vs. ISPA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXHC.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares eb.rexx Government Germany 2.5-5.5yr UCITS ETF (DE) (EXHC.DE) and iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (ISPA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXHC.DE achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than ISPA.DE's 14.66% return. Over the past 10 years, EXHC.DE has underperformed ISPA.DE with an annualized return of -0.63%, while ISPA.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.88% annualized return.


EXHC.DE

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.67%
6M
0.42%
YTD
0.37%
1Y
0.40%
3Y*
2.33%
5Y*
-0.87%
10Y*
-0.63%

ISPA.DE

1D
0.47%
1M
1.53%
6M
13.66%
YTD
14.66%
1Y
28.82%
3Y*
18.87%
5Y*
10.92%
10Y*
8.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXHC.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EXHC.DE
iShares eb.rexx Government Germany 2.5-5.5yr UCITS ETF (DE)
0.37%1.16%1.57%4.17%-10.23%-1.37%-0.09%-0.18%0.47%-1.24%
ISPA.DE
iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE)
14.66%19.72%12.97%4.78%-1.91%22.80%-9.12%24.23%-6.97%2.97%

Correlation

The correlation between EXHC.DE and ISPA.DE is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2009

-0.09

The correlation between EXHC.DE and ISPA.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXHC.DE vs. ISPA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXHC.DE
EXHC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
EXHC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXHC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXHC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
EXHC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXHC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

ISPA.DE
ISPA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ISPA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISPA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISPA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ISPA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISPA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXHC.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares eb.rexx Government Germany 2.5-5.5yr UCITS ETF (DE) (EXHC.DE) and iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (ISPA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EXHC.DEISPA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.59

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.19

7.87

-7.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.46

28.42

-27.96

EXHC.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXHC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the ISPA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXHC.DE and ISPA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EXHC.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXHC.DE drawdown since its inception was -14.39%, smaller than the maximum ISPA.DE drawdown of -38.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXHC.DE and ISPA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXHC.DEISPA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.39%

-38.90%

+24.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.06%

-3.64%

+1.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.33%

-15.09%

+12.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.55%

-15.09%

+2.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.39%

-38.90%

+24.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.78%

-0.29%

-6.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.90%

-4.53%

+1.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

1.01%

-0.14%

Volatility

EXHC.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares eb.rexx Government Germany 2.5-5.5yr UCITS ETF (DE) (EXHC.DE) is 0.52%, while iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (ISPA.DE) has a volatility of 2.36%. This indicates that EXHC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISPA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXHC.DEISPA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.52%

2.36%

-1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.06%

6.87%

-4.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39%

8.95%

-6.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.59%

11.97%

-8.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.76%

14.65%

-11.89%

EXHC.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXHC.DE has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than ISPA.DE's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

EXHC.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Dividend Comparison

EXHC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than ISPA.DE's 3.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EXHC.DE
iShares eb.rexx Government Germany 2.5-5.5yr UCITS ETF (DE)
1.40%1.38%1.11%0.81%0.41%0.68%0.86%1.08%0.91%1.34%1.65%1.82%
ISPA.DE
iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE)
3.71%4.52%4.89%5.91%4.87%3.31%4.04%4.02%4.01%5.66%3.64%4.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


EXHC.DE and ISPA.DE have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EXHC.DE is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EXHC.DE is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for ISPA.DE.

EXHC.DE is categorized as Government Bonds, while ISPA.DE is Global Equities. EXHC.DE tracks eb.rexx Government Germany 2.5-5.5 Index, while ISPA.DE tracks STOXX® Global Select Dividend 100 index. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for EXHC.DE and 0.46% for ISPA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXHC.DE and ISPA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer