PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXH4.DE vs. ESIN.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXH4.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares STOXX Europe 600 Industrial Goods & Services UCITS ETF (DE) (EXH4.DE) and iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIN.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EXH4.DE having a 8.61% return and ESIN.DE slightly higher at 8.75%.


EXH4.DE

1D
0.57%
1M
1.72%
YTD
8.61%
6M
10.71%
1Y
14.50%
3Y*
17.96%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*
12.08%

ESIN.DE

1D
0.51%
1M
0.39%
YTD
8.75%
6M
11.05%
1Y
15.27%
3Y*
19.52%
5Y*
12.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXH4.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EXH4.DE
iShares STOXX Europe 600 Industrial Goods & Services UCITS ETF (DE)
8.61%23.72%14.66%23.26%-18.58%13.22%
ESIN.DE
iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
8.75%25.30%14.45%26.98%-16.86%13.86%

Correlation

The correlation between EXH4.DE and ESIN.DE is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2021

0.97

The correlation between EXH4.DE and ESIN.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXH4.DE vs. ESIN.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXH4.DE
EXH4.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
EXH4.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXH4.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXH4.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
EXH4.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXH4.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

ESIN.DE
ESIN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
ESIN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESIN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESIN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
ESIN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESIN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXH4.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares STOXX Europe 600 Industrial Goods & Services UCITS ETF (DE) (EXH4.DE) and iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EXH4.DEESIN.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.15

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

1.16

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.91

4.21

-0.30

EXH4.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXH4.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is comparable to the ESIN.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXH4.DE and ESIN.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EXH4.DEESIN.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

0.78

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.67

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.70

-0.22

Drawdowns

EXH4.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXH4.DE drawdown since its inception was -60.02%, which is greater than ESIN.DE's maximum drawdown of -29.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXH4.DE and ESIN.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXH4.DEESIN.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.02%

-29.12%

-30.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.28%

-13.11%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.33%

-18.30%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.07%

-29.12%

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

-2.69%

+1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.81%

-6.30%

-3.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.69%

3.61%

+0.08%

Volatility

EXH4.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares STOXX Europe 600 Industrial Goods & Services UCITS ETF (DE) (EXH4.DE) and iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIN.DE) have volatilities of 6.36% and 6.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXH4.DEESIN.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.36%

6.37%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.56%

16.51%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.71%

19.60%

+0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.66%

18.85%

+0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.93%

18.81%

+1.12%

EXH4.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXH4.DE has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than ESIN.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

EXH4.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Dividend Comparison

EXH4.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, while ESIN.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESIN.DE
iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EXH4.DE
iShares STOXX Europe 600 Industrial Goods & Services UCITS ETF (DE)
1.18%1.31%1.51%1.72%1.68%1.08%0.85%1.69%1.67%2.38%2.10%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, EXH4.DE and ESIN.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ESIN.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESIN.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for EXH4.DE.

EXH4.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Industrial Goods & Services, while ESIN.DE tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for EXH4.DE and 0.18% for ESIN.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXH4.DE and ESIN.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer