EXFLX vs. FSMUX
EXFLX (Eaton Vance National Ultra-Short Municipal Income Fund) and FSMUX (Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, EXFLX returned 3.36%/yr vs 3.86%/yr for FSMUX. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EXFLX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for FSMUX.
Performance
EXFLX vs. FSMUX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXFLX achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly lower than FSMUX's 1.47% return.
EXFLX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.06%
- 6M
- 1.30%
- 1Y
- 2.95%
- 3Y*
- 3.36%
- 5Y*
- 2.21%
- 10Y*
- 1.62%
FSMUX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 7.07%
- 3Y*
- 3.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EXFLX vs. FSMUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXFLX Eaton Vance National Ultra-Short Municipal Income Fund | 1.06% | 3.84% | 3.47% | 2.73% | -0.01% | 0.00% |
FSMUX Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund | 1.47% | 3.14% | 2.99% | 6.78% | -11.25% | 0.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between EXFLX and FSMUX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2021 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EXFLX vs. FSMUX — Risk / Return Rank
EXFLX
FSMUX
EXFLX vs. FSMUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance National Ultra-Short Municipal Income Fund (EXFLX) and Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EXFLX | FSMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.09 | 2.69 | +0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 7.91 | 4.63 | +3.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.19 | 1.71 | +1.48 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.25 | 3.15 | +4.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 37.18 | 11.49 | +25.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EXFLX | FSMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.09 | 2.69 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.11 | +0.80 |
Drawdowns
EXFLX vs. FSMUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXFLX drawdown since its inception was -10.11%, smaller than the maximum FSMUX drawdown of -16.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXFLX and FSMUX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXFLX | FSMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.11% | -16.27% | +6.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.41% | -2.68% | +2.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.72% | -5.95% | +5.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -1.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.51% | -5.46% | +3.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.08% | 1.83% | -1.75% |
Volatility
EXFLX vs. FSMUX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance National Ultra-Short Municipal Income Fund (EXFLX) is 0.33%, while Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX) has a volatility of 1.21%. This indicates that EXFLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSMUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EXFLX | FSMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.33% | 1.21% | -0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.69% | 2.10% | -1.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96% | 3.16% | -2.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.08% | 4.64% | -3.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.93% | 4.64% | -3.71% |
EXFLX vs. FSMUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXFLX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMUX's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
EXFLX vs. FSMUX - Dividend Comparison
EXFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, less than FSMUX's 2.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXFLX Eaton Vance National Ultra-Short Municipal Income Fund | 2.70% | 3.66% | 3.51% | 2.48% | 1.12% | 0.02% | 0.52% | 1.67% | 1.37% | 0.79% | 0.70% | 0.49% |
FSMUX Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund | 2.99% | 3.26% | 3.74% | 3.18% | 2.14% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EXFLX and FSMUX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSMUX has higher volatility (1.21%) compared to EXFLX (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EXFLX dropped -10.11% vs FSMUX's -16.27%.
EXFLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 2.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EXFLX and FSMUX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer