EXEQ vs. MBCC

Last updated Jul 8, 2026

EXEQ (Wedbush ReturnOnLeadership U.S. Large-Cap ETF) and MBCC (Monarch Blue Chips Core Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - EXEQ tracks the Solactive Indiggo ReturnOnLeadership U.S. Large-Cap Index while MBCC tracks the Monarch Blue Chips Core Index. Both are passively managed. EXEQ charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for MBCC.

Performance

EXEQ vs. MBCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wedbush ReturnOnLeadership U.S. Large-Cap ETF (EXEQ) and Monarch Blue Chips Core Index ETF (MBCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EXEQ

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 2.22%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MBCC

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXEQ vs. MBCC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
EXEQ Wedbush ReturnOnLeadership U.S. Large-Cap ETF	0.71%
MBCC Monarch Blue Chips Core Index ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

EXEQ vs. MBCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wedbush ReturnOnLeadership U.S. Large-Cap ETF (EXEQ) and Monarch Blue Chips Core Index ETF (MBCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

EXEQ vs. MBCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXEQ drawdown since its inception was -8.92%, which is greater than MBCC's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXEQ and MBCC.

Drawdown Indicators

	EXEQ	MBCC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.92%	0.00%	-8.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.73%	0.00%	-0.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.77%	0.00%	-1.77%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EXEQ	MBCC	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.21%	0.00%	+15.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.21%	0.00%	+15.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.21%	0.00%	+15.21%

EXEQ vs. MBCC - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXEQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MBCC's 1.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

EXEQ vs. MBCC - Dividend Comparison

EXEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, while MBCC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
EXEQ Wedbush ReturnOnLeadership U.S. Large-Cap ETF	0.09%
MBCC Monarch Blue Chips Core Index ETF	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, EXEQ or MBCC?

On fees, EXEQ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EXEQ or MBCC?

EXEQ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for MBCC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EXEQ or MBCC?

EXEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.09%, compared with 0.00% for MBCC.

What is the main difference between EXEQ and MBCC?

EXEQ tracks Solactive Indiggo ReturnOnLeadership U.S. Large-Cap Index, while MBCC tracks Monarch Blue Chips Core Index. They also come from different issuers: Wedbush and Monarch. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EXEQ and 1.14% for MBCC.