PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXCPX vs. BGCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXCPX vs. BGCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manning & Napier Unconstrained Bond Series (EXCPX) and BlackRock Global Long/Short Credit Fund (BGCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXCPX achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly lower than BGCIX's 1.44% return. Over the past 10 years, EXCPX has underperformed BGCIX with an annualized return of 2.85%, while BGCIX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.13% annualized return.


EXCPX

1D
0.20%
1M
-0.06%
6M
0.15%
YTD
0.80%
1Y
2.90%
3Y*
4.91%
5Y*
1.96%
10Y*
2.85%
ALL TIME*
3.95%

BGCIX

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.11%
6M
1.10%
YTD
1.44%
1Y
3.04%
3Y*
6.93%
5Y*
3.31%
10Y*
4.13%
ALL TIME*
3.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

EXCPX vs. BGCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EXCPX
Manning & Napier Unconstrained Bond Series
0.80%6.17%4.09%6.00%-6.71%2.58%7.54%5.01%0.20%3.19%
BGCIX
BlackRock Global Long/Short Credit Fund
1.44%6.55%8.47%8.87%-8.02%3.48%10.71%7.43%-1.78%3.46%

Correlation

The correlation between EXCPX and BGCIX is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2011

0.22

Over the past year, EXCPX and BGCIX have become more correlated (0.47) than their long-term average of 0.22, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXCPX vs. BGCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EXCPX
EXCPX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
EXCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
EXCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

BGCIX
BGCIX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
BGCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
BGCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EXCPX vs. BGCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Unconstrained Bond Series (EXCPX) and BlackRock Global Long/Short Credit Fund (BGCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EXCPXBGCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.57

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

3.19

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.89

12.87

-4.98

EXCPX vs. BGCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXCPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the BGCIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXCPX and BGCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EXCPX vs. BGCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXCPX drawdown since its inception was -9.65%, smaller than the maximum BGCIX drawdown of -10.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXCPX and BGCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXCPXBGCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.65%

-10.37%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.49%

-0.99%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.49%

-2.18%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.10%

-9.78%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.10%

-10.37%

+1.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-0.22%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.28%

-1.26%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.43%

0.25%

+0.18%

Volatility

EXCPX vs. BGCIX - Volatility Comparison

Manning & Napier Unconstrained Bond Series (EXCPX) has a higher volatility of 0.70% compared to BlackRock Global Long/Short Credit Fund (BGCIX) at 0.49%. This indicates that EXCPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BGCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXCPXBGCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.70%

0.49%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.86%

1.07%

+0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22%

1.36%

+0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.84%

1.91%

+0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.41%

3.14%

-0.73%

EXCPX vs. BGCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXCPX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than BGCIX's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

EXCPX vs. BGCIX - Dividend Comparison

EXCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, less than BGCIX's 5.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGCIX
BlackRock Global Long/Short Credit Fund
5.74%5.83%7.13%3.33%8.25%3.57%9.87%3.75%6.01%1.16%0.00%5.11%
EXCPX
Manning & Napier Unconstrained Bond Series
4.44%4.36%4.32%3.72%2.58%5.66%2.61%2.37%2.56%2.28%1.95%3.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


EXCPX and BGCIX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EXCPX has higher volatility (0.70%) compared to BGCIX (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EXCPX dropped -9.65% vs BGCIX's -10.37%.

BGCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXCPX and BGCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer