EXAG.DE vs. UEQU.DE
EXAG.DE (WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) and UEQU.DE (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both Commodities funds - EXAG.DE tracks the Morgan Stanley RADAR ex Agriculture & Livestock Commodity (EUR Hedged) while UEQU.DE tracks the UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EXAG.DE returned 18.34%/yr vs 14.81%/yr for UEQU.DE. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EXAG.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for UEQU.DE.
Performance
EXAG.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXAG.DE achieves a 23.44% return, which is significantly lower than UEQU.DE's 25.53% return.
EXAG.DE
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- -3.06%
- YTD
- 23.44%
- 6M
- 33.80%
- 1Y
- 60.10%
- 3Y*
- 18.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UEQU.DE
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 25.53%
- 6M
- 28.14%
- 1Y
- 41.09%
- 3Y*
- 14.81%
- 5Y*
- 14.40%
- 10Y*
- 10.80%
EXAG.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXAG.DE WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | 23.44% | 32.86% | 1.21% | -10.04% | 12.14% | -0.14% |
UEQU.DE UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 25.53% | 6.36% | 13.03% | -8.33% | 20.34% | 13.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between EXAG.DE and UEQU.DE is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2021 | 0.76 |
The correlation between EXAG.DE and UEQU.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EXAG.DE vs. UEQU.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EXAG.DE
UEQU.DE
EXAG.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EXAG.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UEQU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EXAG.DE | UEQU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.46 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.01 | 6.29 | -1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.27 | 15.25 | +2.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EXAG.DE | UEQU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.73 | 2.60 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.64 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
EXAG.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXAG.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.04%, which is greater than UEQU.DE's maximum drawdown of -30.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXAG.DE and UEQU.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXAG.DE | UEQU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.04% | -30.56% | -4.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.94% | -6.50% | -5.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.69% | -15.66% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.47% | -1.21% | -5.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.25% | -8.92% | -12.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.47% | 2.69% | +0.78% |
Volatility
EXAG.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EXAG.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.02% compared to UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UEQU.DE) at 3.91%. This indicates that EXAG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UEQU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EXAG.DE | UEQU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.02% | 3.91% | +1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.08% | 13.03% | +6.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.98% | 15.73% | +6.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.80% | 16.83% | +3.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.80% | 16.41% | +4.39% |
EXAG.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXAG.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than UEQU.DE's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
EXAG.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EXAG.DE nor UEQU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EXAG.DE and UEQU.DE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UEQU.DE is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UEQU.DE is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EXAG.DE.
EXAG.DE tracks Morgan Stanley RADAR ex Agriculture & Livestock Commodity (EUR Hedged), while UEQU.DE tracks UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for EXAG.DE and 0.34% for UEQU.DE.
Find the right allocation for EXAG.DE and UEQU.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer