PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXA.PA vs. EZJ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EXA.PA vs. EZJ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Exail Technologies (EXA.PA) and EasyJet plc (EZJ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EXA.PA is traded in EUR, while EZJ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EZJ.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXA.PA achieves a 64.17% return, which is significantly higher than EZJ.L's -4.55% return. Over the past 10 years, EXA.PA has outperformed EZJ.L with an annualized return of 24.49%, while EZJ.L has yielded a comparatively lower -7.99% annualized return.


EXA.PA

1D
1.21%
1M
6.27%
YTD
64.17%
6M
61.59%
1Y
83.04%
3Y*
96.37%
5Y*
63.28%
10Y*
24.49%

EZJ.L

1D
2.48%
1M
36.72%
YTD
-4.55%
6M
-0.26%
1Y
-19.61%
3Y*
0.96%
5Y*
-8.81%
10Y*
-7.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXA.PA vs. EZJ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EXA.PA
Exail Technologies
64.17%369.47%-10.05%-1.93%21.98%75.06%-24.06%106.52%-45.24%-25.84%
EZJ.L
EasyJet plc
-4.55%-11.42%16.04%60.45%-44.63%-15.26%-42.40%44.80%-23.23%49.76%

Correlation

The correlation between EXA.PA and EZJ.L is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2007

0.13

The correlation between EXA.PA and EZJ.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.14 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXA.PA vs. EZJ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXA.PA
EXA.PA Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
EXA.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXA.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXA.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
EXA.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXA.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

EZJ.L
EZJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
EZJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
EZJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXA.PA vs. EZJ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Exail Technologies (EXA.PA) and EasyJet plc (EZJ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EXA.PAEZJ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

0.93

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

-0.46

+2.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.82

-0.79

+4.61

EXA.PA vs. EZJ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXA.PA Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the EZJ.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXA.PA and EZJ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EXA.PAEZJ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

-0.54

+1.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.33

-0.22

+1.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

-0.17

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.04

+0.24

Drawdowns

EXA.PA vs. EZJ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXA.PA drawdown since its inception was -85.70%, which is greater than EZJ.L's maximum drawdown of -81.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXA.PA and EZJ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXA.PAEZJ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.70%

-81.36%

-4.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.72%

-42.22%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.72%

-42.22%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.72%

-66.13%

+23.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.17%

-79.23%

+11.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.08%

-67.00%

+56.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.21%

-44.29%

+8.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.55%

24.66%

-3.11%

Volatility

EXA.PA vs. EZJ.L - Volatility Comparison

Exail Technologies (EXA.PA) has a higher volatility of 19.71% compared to EasyJet plc (EZJ.L) at 16.08%. This indicates that EXA.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EZJ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXA.PAEZJ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.71%

16.08%

+3.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.86%

28.87%

+16.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.55%

36.02%

+29.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.70%

39.55%

+7.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.07%

47.61%

-5.54%

Dividends

EXA.PA vs. EZJ.L - Dividend Comparison

EXA.PA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EZJ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EXA.PA
Exail Technologies
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.47%2.53%1.88%3.81%0.00%0.00%1.30%
EZJ.L
EasyJet plc
2.81%2.37%0.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%6.28%4.89%4.40%4.36%6.52%3.10%

Financials

EXA.PA vs. EZJ.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Exail Technologies and EasyJet plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. EXA.PA values in EUR, EZJ.L values in GBp

Frequently Asked Questions


EXA.PA and EZJ.L have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXA.PA and EZJ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer