PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EX20.AX vs. CRED.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EX20.AX vs. CRED.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Betashares Australian Ex-20 Portfolio Diversifier ETF (EX20.AX) and Betashares Australian Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (CRED.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EX20.AX achieves a -7.82% return, which is significantly lower than CRED.AX's 0.80% return.


EX20.AX

1D
-1.05%
1M
-3.95%
6M
-9.71%
YTD
-7.82%
1Y
-3.99%
3Y*
5.40%
5Y*
3.58%
10Y*

CRED.AX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.14%
6M
-0.06%
YTD
0.80%
1Y
0.82%
3Y*
5.71%
5Y*
0.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EX20.AX vs. CRED.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EX20.AX
Betashares Australian Ex-20 Portfolio Diversifier ETF
-7.82%14.21%10.11%6.68%-10.28%16.05%1.28%26.55%-6.54%
CRED.AX
Betashares Australian Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
0.80%4.54%6.26%10.78%-14.47%-3.35%7.78%11.29%3.70%

Correlation

The correlation between EX20.AX and CRED.AX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2018

0.16

The correlation between EX20.AX and CRED.AX shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EX20.AX vs. CRED.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EX20.AX
EX20.AX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
EX20.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EX20.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
EX20.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
EX20.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
EX20.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

CRED.AX
CRED.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
CRED.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRED.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRED.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
CRED.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRED.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EX20.AX vs. CRED.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares Australian Ex-20 Portfolio Diversifier ETF (EX20.AX) and Betashares Australian Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (CRED.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EX20.AXCRED.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.03

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.23

0.14

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.52

0.28

-0.80

EX20.AX vs. CRED.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EX20.AX Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the CRED.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EX20.AX and CRED.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EX20.AX vs. CRED.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EX20.AX drawdown since its inception was -39.55%, which is greater than CRED.AX's maximum drawdown of -21.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EX20.AX and CRED.AX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EX20.AXCRED.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.55%

-21.76%

-17.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.84%

-5.54%

-11.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.84%

-5.54%

-11.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.65%

-21.76%

+3.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.74%

-2.41%

-9.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

-5.72%

+0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.60%

2.87%

+4.73%

Volatility

EX20.AX vs. CRED.AX - Volatility Comparison

Betashares Australian Ex-20 Portfolio Diversifier ETF (EX20.AX) has a higher volatility of 4.19% compared to Betashares Australian Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (CRED.AX) at 0.89%. This indicates that EX20.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRED.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EX20.AXCRED.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.19%

0.89%

+3.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.82%

3.70%

+10.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.52%

4.46%

+12.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.01%

6.36%

+8.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.89%

6.21%

+9.68%

EX20.AX vs. CRED.AX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EX20.AX and CRED.AX have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EX20.AX vs. CRED.AX - Dividend Comparison

EX20.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than CRED.AX's 3.93% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRED.AX
Betashares Australian Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
3.93%4.49%4.01%4.53%3.53%5.14%4.29%3.35%1.82%0.00%
EX20.AX
Betashares Australian Ex-20 Portfolio Diversifier ETF
1.64%3.52%1.46%1.71%1.44%1.80%2.68%4.51%3.89%1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


EX20.AX and CRED.AX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EX20.AX and CRED.AX have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

EX20.AX is categorized as Australian Equities, while CRED.AX is Corporate Bonds. EX20.AX tracks Solactive Australia ex 20 Index, while CRED.AX tracks Solactive Australian Investment Grade Corporate Bond Select TR Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EX20.AX and CRED.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer