EWY vs. WGMI

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) and WGMI (CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWY is a South Korea Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea Index, while WGMI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by CoinShares. EWY is passively managed, while WGMI is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, EWY returned 38.38%/yr vs 48.22%/yr for WGMI. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EWY charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for WGMI.

Performance

EWY vs. WGMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWY achieves a 67.52% return, which is significantly higher than WGMI's 37.71% return.

EWY

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -25.70%
• 6M: 45.13%
• YTD: 67.52%
• 1Y: 130.03%
• 3Y*: 38.38%
• 5Y*: 15.11%
• 10Y*: 13.73%
• ALL TIME*: 9.80%

WGMI

• 1D: 10.78%
• 1M: -26.91%
• 6M: 3.21%
• YTD: 37.71%
• 1Y: 97.01%
• 3Y*: 48.22%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWY vs. WGMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF	67.52%	95.33%	-20.48%	19.05%	-21.65%
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF	37.71%	72.47%	23.54%	304.08%	-82.94%

Correlation

The correlation between EWY and WGMI is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2022	0.45

EWY vs. WGMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EWY	WGMI
Technology	56.1%	47.8%
Industrials	14.6%	0.7%
Financial Services	11.3%	45.4%
Consumer Cyclical	5.9%	-
Healthcare	3.3%	-
Communication Services	2.6%	2.0%
Basic Materials	2.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	-
Energy	0.8%	-
Utilities	0.3%	4.1%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

EWY vs. WGMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWY

EWY Risk / Return Rank: 89
EWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
EWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
EWY Omega Ratio Rank: 86
EWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
EWY Martin Ratio Rank: 91

WGMI

WGMI Risk / Return Rank: 45
WGMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
WGMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
WGMI Omega Ratio Rank: 44
WGMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
WGMI Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWY vs. WGMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EWY	WGMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.53	1.24	+1.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.78	1.90	+0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.22	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.06	1.91	+3.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.04	3.77	+12.27

EWY vs. WGMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWY Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the WGMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWY and WGMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EWY vs. WGMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWY drawdown since its inception was -74.14%, smaller than the maximum WGMI drawdown of -85.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWY and WGMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	EWY	WGMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.14%	-85.76%	+11.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.85%	-50.94%	+25.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.36%	-62.79%	+35.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.70%	-26.91%	+1.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.09%	-42.09%	+22.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.14%	25.85%	-17.71%

Volatility

EWY vs. WGMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) is 22.94%, while CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) has a volatility of 24.38%. This indicates that EWY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WGMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EWY	WGMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.94%	24.38%	-1.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	48.48%	57.47%	-8.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.71%	78.75%	-27.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.91%	81.64%	-49.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.90%	81.64%	-52.74%

EWY vs. WGMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWY has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than WGMI's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

EWY vs. WGMI - Dividend Comparison

EWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, while WGMI has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF	1.25%	2.10%	2.55%	2.52%	1.23%	2.16%	0.73%	2.10%	1.34%	2.90%	1.21%	2.42%
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.22%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EWY and WGMI in my portfolio?

EWY and WGMI have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EWY or WGMI?

WGMI has higher volatility (24.38%) compared to EWY (22.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWY dropped -74.14% vs WGMI's -85.76%.

Which ETF is better, EWY or WGMI?

On 3-year performance, WGMI leads with 48.22% vs 38.38% for EWY. On fees, EWY is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, EWY has been the lower-risk option at 22.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EWY or WGMI?

Over the 3-year period, WGMI has performed better with a 48.22% return vs 38.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EWY or WGMI?

EWY is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for WGMI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EWY or WGMI?

EWY has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.00% for WGMI.

What is the main difference between EWY and WGMI?

EWY is categorized as South Korea Equities, while WGMI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: iShares and CoinShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWY and 0.75% for WGMI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.