EWY vs. VDE
EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) and VDE (Vanguard Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea Index, while VDE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWY returned 16.84%/yr vs 9.39%/yr for VDE. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EWY charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VDE.
Performance
EWY vs. VDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWY achieves a 103.10% return, which is significantly higher than VDE's 29.66% return. Over the past 10 years, EWY has outperformed VDE with an annualized return of 16.84%, while VDE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.39% annualized return.
EWY
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 103.10%
- 6M
- 117.85%
- 1Y
- 198.25%
- 3Y*
- 46.46%
- 5Y*
- 18.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.84%
VDE
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- YTD
- 29.66%
- 6M
- 28.33%
- 1Y
- 37.57%
- 3Y*
- 16.71%
- 5Y*
- 20.05%
- 10Y*
- 9.39%
EWY vs. VDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 103.10% | 95.33% | -20.48% | 19.05% | -26.59% | -7.58% | 39.43% | 7.97% | -20.37% | 44.97% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 29.66% | 7.11% | 6.75% | 0.03% | 62.89% | 56.31% | -33.02% | 9.28% | -19.95% | -2.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWY and VDE is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2004 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, the correlation between EWY and VDE has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
EWY vs. VDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWY
VDE
Technology
-
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
EWY
VDE
-
Industrials
EWY
VDE
Financial Services
EWY
VDE
-
Consumer Cyclical
EWY
VDE
-
Healthcare
EWY
VDE
-
Communication Services
EWY
VDE
-
Basic Materials
EWY
VDE
Consumer Defensive
EWY
VDE
-
Energy
EWY
VDE
Utilities
EWY
VDE
-
Real Estate
EWY
-
VDE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWY vs. VDE — Risk / Return Rank
EWY
VDE
EWY vs. VDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWY | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.30 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.65 | 3.20 | +5.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.24 | 8.95 | +21.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWY vs. VDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWY drawdown since its inception was -74.14%, roughly equal to the maximum VDE drawdown of -74.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWY and VDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWY | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.14% | -74.20% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.08% | -11.80% | -11.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.36% | -21.41% | -5.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.55% | -26.58% | -21.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.73% | -69.29% | +19.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.88% | -8.26% | -0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.11% | -19.95% | -0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.59% | 4.21% | +2.38% |
Volatility
EWY vs. VDE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a higher volatility of 25.64% compared to Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) at 7.15%. This indicates that EWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWY | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.64% | 7.15% | +18.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.65% | 16.59% | +26.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.51% | 20.46% | +26.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.15% | 26.45% | +3.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.06% | 29.93% | -1.87% |
EWY vs. VDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWY has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VDE's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWY vs. VDE - Dividend Comparison
EWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than VDE's 2.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 1.03% | 2.10% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 1.23% | 2.16% | 0.73% | 2.10% | 1.34% | 2.90% | 1.21% | 2.42% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 2.42% | 3.11% | 3.23% | 3.34% | 3.65% | 4.13% | 4.76% | 3.42% | 3.35% | 2.90% | 2.31% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWY and VDE have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWY has higher volatility (25.64%) compared to VDE (7.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWY dropped -74.14% vs VDE's -74.20%.
On 10-year performance, EWY leads with 16.84% vs 9.39% for VDE. On fees, VDE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VDE has been the lower-risk option at 7.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWY has performed better with a 16.84% return vs 9.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VDE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWY.
VDE has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 1.03% for EWY.
EWY is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while VDE is Energy Equities. EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index, while VDE tracks MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWY and 0.09% for VDE.
EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.29 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWY and VDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer