EWY vs. REMX
EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) and REMX (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea Index, while REMX is a Materials fund tracking the MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWY returned 16.84%/yr vs 10.32%/yr for REMX. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.59% expense ratio.
Performance
EWY vs. REMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWY achieves a 103.10% return, which is significantly higher than REMX's 29.19% return. Over the past 10 years, EWY has outperformed REMX with an annualized return of 16.84%, while REMX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.32% annualized return.
EWY
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 103.10%
- 6M
- 117.85%
- 1Y
- 198.25%
- 3Y*
- 46.46%
- 5Y*
- 18.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.84%
REMX
- 1D
- 2.73%
- 1M
- -10.13%
- YTD
- 29.19%
- 6M
- 34.20%
- 1Y
- 144.64%
- 3Y*
- 5.16%
- 5Y*
- 4.80%
- 10Y*
- 10.32%
EWY vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 103.10% | 95.33% | -20.48% | 19.05% | -26.59% | -7.58% | 39.43% | 7.97% | -20.37% | 44.97% |
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | 29.19% | 92.95% | -35.02% | -19.18% | -31.13% | 79.81% | 64.82% | 0.74% | -49.63% | 82.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWY and REMX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2010 | 0.52 |
The correlation between EWY and REMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EWY vs. REMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWY
REMX
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
EWY
REMX
-
Industrials
EWY
REMX
-
Financial Services
EWY
REMX
-
Consumer Cyclical
EWY
REMX
-
Healthcare
EWY
REMX
-
Communication Services
EWY
REMX
-
Basic Materials
EWY
REMX
Consumer Defensive
EWY
REMX
-
Energy
EWY
REMX
-
Utilities
EWY
REMX
-
Real Estate
EWY
-
REMX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWY vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank
EWY
REMX
EWY vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWY | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.40 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.65 | 6.23 | +2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.24 | 16.82 | +13.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWY vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWY drawdown since its inception was -74.14%, smaller than the maximum REMX drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWY and REMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWY | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.14% | -90.20% | +16.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.08% | -23.35% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.36% | -62.11% | +34.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.55% | -73.34% | +24.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.73% | -73.34% | +23.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.88% | -56.27% | +47.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.11% | -66.84% | +46.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.59% | 8.63% | -2.04% |
Volatility
EWY vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a higher volatility of 25.64% compared to VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) at 17.56%. This indicates that EWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWY | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.64% | 17.56% | +8.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.65% | 37.14% | +5.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.51% | 49.74% | -3.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.15% | 40.64% | -10.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.06% | 37.14% | -9.08% |
EWY vs. REMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EWY and REMX have an expense ratio of 0.59%.
Dividends
EWY vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison
EWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than REMX's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 1.03% | 2.10% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 1.23% | 2.16% | 0.73% | 2.10% | 1.34% | 2.90% | 1.21% | 2.42% |
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | 1.36% | 1.76% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 1.56% | 5.25% | 0.81% | 1.64% | 12.43% | 2.89% | 2.23% | 4.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWY and REMX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWY has higher volatility (25.64%) compared to REMX (17.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWY dropped -74.14% vs REMX's -90.20%.
On 10-year performance, EWY leads with 16.84% vs 10.32% for REMX. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, REMX has been the lower-risk option at 17.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWY has performed better with a 16.84% return vs 10.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWY and REMX have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.
REMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 1.03% for EWY.
EWY is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while REMX is Materials. EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index, while REMX tracks MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck.
EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.29 vs 2.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWY and REMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer