EWY vs. IXC
EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) and IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWY is a South Korea Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea Index, while IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWY returned 13.73%/yr vs 9.55%/yr for IXC. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EWY charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IXC.
Performance
EWY vs. IXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWY achieves a 67.52% return, which is significantly higher than IXC's 29.64% return. Over the past 10 years, EWY has outperformed IXC with an annualized return of 13.73%, while IXC has yielded a comparatively lower 9.55% annualized return.
EWY
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -25.70%
- 6M
- 45.13%
- YTD
- 67.52%
- 1Y
- 130.03%
- 3Y*
- 38.38%
- 5Y*
- 15.11%
- 10Y*
- 13.73%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.80%
IXC
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 7.63%
- 6M
- 22.98%
- YTD
- 29.64%
- 1Y
- 39.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.82%
- 5Y*
- 21.62%
- 10Y*
- 9.55%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.36%
EWY vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 67.52% | 95.33% | -20.48% | 19.05% | -26.59% | -7.58% | 39.43% | 7.97% | -20.37% | 44.97% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 29.64% | 13.98% | 1.95% | 3.92% | 48.51% | 40.88% | -31.00% | 12.67% | -14.85% | 5.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWY and IXC is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2001 | 0.46 |
Over the past year, the correlation between EWY and IXC has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
EWY vs. IXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWY
IXC
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
EWY
IXC
-
Industrials
EWY
IXC
-
Financial Services
EWY
IXC
-
Consumer Cyclical
EWY
IXC
-
Healthcare
EWY
IXC
-
Communication Services
EWY
IXC
-
Basic Materials
EWY
IXC
-
Consumer Defensive
EWY
IXC
-
Energy
EWY
IXC
Utilities
EWY
IXC
Real Estate
EWY
-
IXC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWY vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank
EWY
IXC
EWY vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWY | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.34 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.06 | 2.60 | +2.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.04 | 8.11 | +7.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWY vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWY drawdown since its inception was -74.14%, which is greater than IXC's maximum drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWY and IXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWY | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.14% | -67.88% | -6.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.85% | -15.36% | -10.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.36% | -19.06% | -8.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.15% | -24.93% | -22.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.73% | -64.16% | +14.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.70% | -6.70% | -19.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.09% | -17.44% | -2.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.14% | 4.91% | +3.23% |
Volatility
EWY vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a higher volatility of 22.94% compared to iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) at 6.05%. This indicates that EWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWY | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.94% | 6.05% | +16.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.48% | 15.78% | +32.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.71% | 19.38% | +32.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.91% | 23.39% | +8.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.90% | 26.82% | +2.08% |
EWY vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWY has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IXC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWY vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison
EWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than IXC's 2.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 1.25% | 2.10% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 1.23% | 2.16% | 0.73% | 2.10% | 1.34% | 2.90% | 1.21% | 2.42% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 2.93% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWY and IXC have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWY has higher volatility (22.94%) compared to IXC (6.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWY dropped -74.14% vs IXC's -67.88%.
On 10-year performance, EWY leads with 13.73% vs 9.55% for IXC. On fees, IXC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, IXC has been the lower-risk option at 6.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWY has performed better with a 13.73% return vs 9.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IXC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWY.
IXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 1.25% for EWY.
EWY is categorized as South Korea Equities, while IXC is Energy Equities. EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index, while IXC tracks S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWY and 0.40% for IXC.
EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWY and IXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer