EWY vs. EUFN
EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) and EUFN (iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea Index, while EUFN is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Financials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWY returned 16.84%/yr vs 13.48%/yr for EUFN. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWY charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for EUFN.
Performance
EWY vs. EUFN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWY achieves a 103.10% return, which is significantly higher than EUFN's 4.75% return. Over the past 10 years, EWY has outperformed EUFN with an annualized return of 16.84%, while EUFN has yielded a comparatively lower 13.48% annualized return.
EWY
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- 103.10%
- 6M
- 117.85%
- 1Y
- 203.95%
- 3Y*
- 46.46%
- 5Y*
- 18.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.84%
EUFN
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- YTD
- 4.75%
- 6M
- 9.10%
- 1Y
- 28.57%
- 3Y*
- 32.04%
- 5Y*
- 18.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.48%
EWY vs. EUFN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 103.10% | 95.33% | -20.48% | 19.05% | -26.59% | -7.58% | 39.43% | 7.97% | -20.37% | 44.97% |
EUFN iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF | 4.75% | 65.73% | 17.20% | 26.15% | -8.78% | 19.13% | -8.55% | 20.73% | -23.14% | 26.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWY and EUFN is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2010 | 0.57 |
The correlation between EWY and EUFN shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EWY vs. EUFN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWY
EUFN
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
EWY
EUFN
Industrials
EWY
EUFN
Financial Services
EWY
EUFN
Consumer Cyclical
EWY
EUFN
Healthcare
EWY
EUFN
-
Communication Services
EWY
EUFN
-
Basic Materials
EWY
EUFN
-
Consumer Defensive
EWY
EUFN
-
Energy
EWY
EUFN
-
Utilities
EWY
EUFN
-
Real Estate
EWY
-
EUFN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWY vs. EUFN — Risk / Return Rank
EWY
EUFN
EWY vs. EUFN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWY | EUFN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.23 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.65 | 1.79 | +6.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.24 | 6.24 | +24.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWY vs. EUFN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWY drawdown since its inception was -74.14%, which is greater than EUFN's maximum drawdown of -53.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWY and EUFN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWY | EUFN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.14% | -53.25% | -20.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.08% | -14.77% | -8.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.36% | -15.95% | -11.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.55% | -35.15% | -13.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.73% | -53.25% | +3.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.88% | -0.10% | -8.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.11% | -14.53% | -5.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.59% | 4.23% | +2.36% |
Volatility
EWY vs. EUFN - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a higher volatility of 25.64% compared to iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN) at 6.96%. This indicates that EWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUFN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWY | EUFN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.64% | 6.96% | +18.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.65% | 17.05% | +25.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.51% | 20.17% | +26.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.15% | 21.88% | +8.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.06% | 24.53% | +3.53% |
EWY vs. EUFN - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWY has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than EUFN's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWY vs. EUFN - Dividend Comparison
EWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than EUFN's 3.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUFN iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF | 3.41% | 3.57% | 5.36% | 5.00% | 4.24% | 4.15% | 1.38% | 4.55% | 6.48% | 3.04% | 4.03% | 3.65% |
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 1.03% | 2.10% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 1.23% | 2.16% | 0.73% | 2.10% | 1.34% | 2.90% | 1.21% | 2.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWY and EUFN have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWY has higher volatility (25.64%) compared to EUFN (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWY dropped -74.14% vs EUFN's -53.25%.
On 10-year performance, EWY leads with 16.84% vs 13.48% for EUFN. On fees, EUFN is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, EUFN has been the lower-risk option at 6.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWY has performed better with a 16.84% return vs 13.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EUFN is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWY.
EUFN has the higher dividend yield at 3.41%, compared with 1.03% for EWY.
EWY is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while EUFN is Financials Equities. EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index, while EUFN tracks MSCI Europe Financials Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWY and 0.48% for EUFN.
EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.29 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWY and EUFN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer