EWY vs. ECH
EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) and ECH (iShares MSCI Chile ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea Index, while ECH is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI Chile Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWY returned 17.46%/yr vs 4.25%/yr for ECH. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.59% expense ratio.
Performance
EWY vs. ECH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWY achieves a 119.05% return, which is significantly higher than ECH's -1.19% return. Over the past 10 years, EWY has outperformed ECH with an annualized return of 17.46%, while ECH has yielded a comparatively lower 4.25% annualized return.
EWY
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 30.18%
- YTD
- 119.05%
- 6M
- 134.13%
- 1Y
- 251.82%
- 3Y*
- 51.99%
- 5Y*
- 20.31%
- 10Y*
- 17.46%
ECH
- 1D
- -1.65%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- YTD
- -1.19%
- 6M
- 3.73%
- 1Y
- 29.60%
- 3Y*
- 14.12%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- 4.25%
EWY vs. ECH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 119.05% | 95.33% | -20.48% | 19.05% | -26.59% | -7.58% | 39.43% | 7.97% | -20.37% | 44.97% |
ECH iShares MSCI Chile ETF | -1.19% | 65.41% | -8.67% | 9.01% | 25.12% | -19.80% | -7.13% | -17.79% | -18.98% | 41.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWY and ECH is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2007 | 0.52 |
The correlation between EWY and ECH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
EWY vs. ECH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWY
ECH
Technology
-
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
EWY
ECH
-
Industrials
EWY
ECH
Financial Services
EWY
ECH
Consumer Cyclical
EWY
ECH
Healthcare
EWY
ECH
-
Communication Services
EWY
ECH
Basic Materials
EWY
ECH
Consumer Defensive
EWY
ECH
Energy
EWY
ECH
-
Utilities
EWY
ECH
Real Estate
EWY
-
ECH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWY vs. ECH — Risk / Return Rank
EWY
ECH
EWY vs. ECH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWY | ECH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 6.02 | 1.20 | +4.83 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.31 | 1.70 | +3.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.74 | 1.21 | +0.53 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.99 | 1.51 | +9.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 40.91 | 3.82 | +37.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWY | ECH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.02 | 1.20 | +4.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.40 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.16 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.05 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
EWY vs. ECH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWY drawdown since its inception was -74.14%, roughly equal to the maximum ECH drawdown of -74.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWY and ECH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWY | ECH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.14% | -74.08% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.08% | -19.65% | -3.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.36% | -25.59% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.55% | -26.06% | -22.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.73% | -66.89% | +17.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.73% | -26.58% | +24.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.13% | -37.52% | +17.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.19% | 7.76% | -1.57% |
Volatility
EWY vs. ECH - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a higher volatility of 20.32% compared to iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH) at 7.72%. This indicates that EWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWY | ECH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.32% | 7.72% | +12.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.41% | 20.29% | +17.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.10% | 24.85% | +17.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.83% | 27.51% | +1.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.37% | 27.21% | +0.16% |
EWY vs. ECH - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EWY and ECH have an expense ratio of 0.59%.
Dividends
EWY vs. ECH - Dividend Comparison
EWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than ECH's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECH iShares MSCI Chile ETF | 2.04% | 2.01% | 3.12% | 4.77% | 6.73% | 5.49% | 2.16% | 2.47% | 2.37% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 2.13% |
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 0.96% | 2.10% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 1.23% | 2.16% | 0.73% | 2.10% | 1.34% | 2.90% | 1.21% | 2.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWY and ECH have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWY has higher volatility (20.32%) compared to ECH (7.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWY dropped -74.14% vs ECH's -74.08%.
On 10-year performance, EWY leads with 17.46% vs 4.25% for ECH. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, ECH has been the lower-risk option at 7.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWY has performed better with a 17.46% return vs 4.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWY and ECH have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.
ECH has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.96% for EWY.
EWY is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while ECH is Foreign Large Cap Equities. EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index, while ECH tracks MSCI Chile Investable Market Index.
EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.02 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWY and ECH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer