EWSP.L vs. SWDA.L
EWSP.L (iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and SWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - EWSP.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while SWDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EWSP.L returned 12.30%/yr vs 17.68%/yr for SWDA.L. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
EWSP.L vs. SWDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EWSP.L is traded in GBP, while SWDA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SWDA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EWSP.L having a 9.60% return and SWDA.L slightly higher at 10.08%.
EWSP.L
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 4.78%
- YTD
- 9.60%
- 6M
- 10.10%
- 1Y
- 21.05%
- 3Y*
- 12.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SWDA.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 10.08%
- 6M
- 10.35%
- 1Y
- 27.25%
- 3Y*
- 17.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.06%
- 10Y*
- 13.91%
EWSP.L vs. SWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWSP.L iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 9.60% | 3.96% | 14.13% | 7.72% | -1.67% |
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.08% | 12.64% | 21.11% | 17.59% | -4.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWSP.L and SWDA.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2022 | 0.82 |
The correlation between EWSP.L and SWDA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EWSP.L vs. SWDA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWSP.L
SWDA.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Technology
EWSP.L
SWDA.L
Financial Services
EWSP.L
SWDA.L
Industrials
EWSP.L
SWDA.L
Healthcare
EWSP.L
SWDA.L
Consumer Cyclical
EWSP.L
SWDA.L
Consumer Defensive
EWSP.L
SWDA.L
Real Estate
EWSP.L
SWDA.L
Utilities
EWSP.L
SWDA.L
Energy
EWSP.L
SWDA.L
Communication Services
EWSP.L
SWDA.L
Basic Materials
EWSP.L
SWDA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWSP.L vs. SWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
EWSP.L
SWDA.L
EWSP.L vs. SWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EWSP.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWSP.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.51 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.69 | 4.14 | -0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.84 | 16.55 | -4.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWSP.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 2.66 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.98 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.88 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
EWSP.L vs. SWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWSP.L drawdown since its inception was -19.59%, smaller than the maximum SWDA.L drawdown of -25.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWSP.L and SWDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWSP.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.59% | -25.58% | +5.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.68% | -6.55% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.59% | -18.50% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.10% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.68% | -3.49% | -1.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.77% | 1.64% | +0.13% |
Volatility
EWSP.L vs. SWDA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EWSP.L) is 1.96%, while iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) has a volatility of 2.52%. This indicates that EWSP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWSP.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.96% | 2.52% | -0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.50% | 7.29% | -0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.72% | 10.19% | -0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.22% | 13.30% | -0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.22% | 14.50% | -1.28% |
EWSP.L vs. SWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EWSP.L and SWDA.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EWSP.L vs. SWDA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EWSP.L nor SWDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EWSP.L and SWDA.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EWSP.L and SWDA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
EWSP.L is categorized as S&P 500, while SWDA.L is Global Equities. EWSP.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index.
Find the right allocation for EWSP.L and SWDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer