EWSP.L vs. MOAT

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

EWSP.L (iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWSP.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while MOAT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EWSP.L returned 13.60%/yr vs 9.42%/yr for MOAT. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWSP.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for MOAT.

Performance

EWSP.L vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EWSP.L) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

EWSP.L is traded in GBP, while MOAT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MOAT values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWSP.L achieves a 12.93% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's 0.71% return.

EWSP.L

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 4.65%
• YTD: 12.93%
• 6M: 13.37%
• 1Y: 24.20%
• 3Y*: 13.60%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MOAT

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 1.95%
• YTD: 0.71%
• 6M: -0.14%
• 1Y: 16.02%
• 3Y*: 9.42%
• 5Y*: 8.93%
• 10Y*: 14.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWSP.L vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
EWSP.L iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	12.93%	4.02%	13.96%	7.79%	-18.92%
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF	0.71%	5.13%	12.67%	25.29%	-5.02%

Correlation

The correlation between EWSP.L and MOAT is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2022	0.55

The correlation between EWSP.L and MOAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWSP.L vs. MOAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EWSP.L	MOAT
Technology	20.9%	33.8%
Industrials	14.2%	13.8%
Financial Services	13.9%	9.0%
Healthcare	11.1%	15.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	7.3%
Consumer Defensive	6.3%	17.0%
Real Estate	6.1%	0.8%
Utilities	5.7%	-
Energy	4.0%	-
Basic Materials	3.9%	-
Communication Services	3.9%	2.4%

Return for Risk

EWSP.L vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWSP.L

EWSP.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
EWSP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
EWSP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
EWSP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 87
EWSP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
EWSP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 80

MOAT

MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 25
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 24
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWSP.L vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EWSP.L) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EWSP.L	MOAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.46	1.20	+1.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.42	1.75	+1.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.20	+0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.27	1.38	+2.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.62	3.68	+9.94

EWSP.L vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWSP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWSP.L and MOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EWSP.L vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWSP.L drawdown since its inception was -22.80%, smaller than the maximum MOAT drawdown of -25.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWSP.L and MOAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	EWSP.L	MOAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.80%	-25.85%	+3.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.65%	-11.63%	+5.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.12%	-22.90%	+2.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.90%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-25.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.79%	+3.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.46%	-3.65%	-6.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.77%	4.36%	-2.59%

Volatility

EWSP.L vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EWSP.L) is 2.24%, while VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that EWSP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EWSP.L	MOAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.24%	4.25%	-2.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.65%	9.99%	-3.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.82%	13.39%	-3.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.19%	16.87%	+5.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.19%	18.39%	+3.80%

EWSP.L vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWSP.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MOAT's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

EWSP.L vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

EWSP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EWSP.L iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF	1.37%	1.36%	1.37%	0.86%	1.25%	1.08%	1.46%	1.31%	1.79%	1.07%	1.17%	2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EWSP.L and MOAT in my portfolio?

EWSP.L and MOAT have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EWSP.L or MOAT?

On fees, EWSP.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EWSP.L or MOAT?

EWSP.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for MOAT.

What is the main difference between EWSP.L and MOAT?

EWSP.L is categorized as S&P 500, while MOAT is Large Cap Blend Equities. EWSP.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EWSP.L and 0.47% for MOAT.