PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWSP.L vs. IUIS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWSP.L vs. IUIS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EWSP.L) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUIS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EWSP.L is traded in GBP, while IUIS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUIS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWSP.L achieves a 11.78% return, which is significantly lower than IUIS.L's 16.25% return.


EWSP.L

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.70%
6M
7.82%
YTD
11.78%
1Y
17.92%
3Y*
12.19%
5Y*
10Y*

IUIS.L

1D
0.23%
1M
-1.68%
6M
7.81%
YTD
16.25%
1Y
20.24%
3Y*
18.15%
5Y*
13.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWSP.L vs. IUIS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EWSP.L
iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
11.78%4.02%13.96%7.79%-18.92%
IUIS.L
iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
16.25%10.68%19.59%11.97%4.66%

Correlation

The correlation between EWSP.L and IUIS.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2022

0.77

The correlation between EWSP.L and IUIS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWSP.L vs. IUIS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWSP.L
IUIS.L

Technology

20.9%
3.5%

Industrials

14.2%
90.3%

Financial Services

13.9%

-

Healthcare

11.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%

-

Real Estate

6.1%

-

Utilities

5.7%
5.3%

Energy

4.0%

-

Basic Materials

3.9%
0.2%

Communication Services

3.9%

-

Technology

EWSP.L
20.9%
IUIS.L
3.5%

Industrials

EWSP.L
14.2%
IUIS.L
90.3%

Financial Services

EWSP.L
13.9%
IUIS.L

-

Healthcare

EWSP.L
11.1%
IUIS.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

EWSP.L
10.1%
IUIS.L
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

EWSP.L
6.3%
IUIS.L

-

Real Estate

EWSP.L
6.1%
IUIS.L

-

Utilities

EWSP.L
5.7%
IUIS.L
5.3%

Energy

EWSP.L
4.0%
IUIS.L

-

Basic Materials

EWSP.L
3.9%
IUIS.L
0.2%

Communication Services

EWSP.L
3.9%
IUIS.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWSP.L vs. IUIS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWSP.L
EWSP.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
EWSP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWSP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWSP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
EWSP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWSP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

IUIS.L
IUIS.L Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
IUIS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUIS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUIS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
IUIS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUIS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWSP.L vs. IUIS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EWSP.L) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUIS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EWSP.LIUIS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.23

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

2.26

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.02

6.75

+3.28

EWSP.L vs. IUIS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWSP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is higher than the IUIS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWSP.L and IUIS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWSP.L vs. IUIS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWSP.L drawdown since its inception was -22.80%, smaller than the maximum IUIS.L drawdown of -35.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWSP.L and IUIS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWSP.LIUIS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.80%

-35.05%

+12.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.65%

-8.92%

+3.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.12%

-20.85%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-3.86%

+2.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.31%

-4.47%

-5.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

2.99%

-1.21%

Volatility

EWSP.L vs. IUIS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EWSP.L) is 2.83%, while iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUIS.L) has a volatility of 5.10%. This indicates that EWSP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUIS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWSP.LIUIS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

5.10%

-2.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.71%

12.72%

-6.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.63%

15.28%

-5.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.05%

17.00%

+5.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.05%

19.21%

+2.84%

EWSP.L vs. IUIS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWSP.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IUIS.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EWSP.L vs. IUIS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EWSP.L nor IUIS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EWSP.L and IUIS.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUIS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUIS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EWSP.L.

EWSP.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while IUIS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EWSP.L and 0.15% for IUIS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWSP.L and IUIS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer