EWSP.L vs. ERNA.L
EWSP.L (iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and ERNA.L (iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - EWSP.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while ERNA.L is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EWSP.L returned 12.30%/yr vs 2.56%/yr for ERNA.L. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EWSP.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for ERNA.L.
Performance
EWSP.L vs. ERNA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EWSP.L is traded in GBP, while ERNA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ERNA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWSP.L achieves a 9.60% return, which is significantly higher than ERNA.L's 2.05% return.
EWSP.L
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 4.78%
- YTD
- 9.60%
- 6M
- 10.10%
- 1Y
- 21.05%
- 3Y*
- 12.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ERNA.L
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.27%
- YTD
- 2.05%
- 6M
- 1.25%
- 1Y
- 5.37%
- 3Y*
- 2.56%
- 5Y*
- 4.89%
- 10Y*
- —
EWSP.L vs. ERNA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWSP.L iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 9.60% | 3.96% | 14.13% | 7.72% | -1.67% |
ERNA.L iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 2.05% | -2.72% | 7.51% | 0.22% | 1.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWSP.L and ERNA.L is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2022 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWSP.L vs. ERNA.L — Risk / Return Rank
EWSP.L
ERNA.L
EWSP.L vs. ERNA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EWSP.L) and iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ERNA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWSP.L | ERNA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.14 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.69 | 1.05 | +2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.84 | 2.88 | +8.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWSP.L | ERNA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 0.82 | +1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.33 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
EWSP.L vs. ERNA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWSP.L drawdown since its inception was -19.59%, which is greater than ERNA.L's maximum drawdown of -15.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWSP.L and ERNA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWSP.L | ERNA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.59% | -15.54% | -4.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.68% | -5.06% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.59% | -9.68% | -9.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.46% | +4.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.68% | -6.91% | +2.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.77% | 1.86% | -0.09% |
Volatility
EWSP.L vs. ERNA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EWSP.L) has a higher volatility of 1.96% compared to iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ERNA.L) at 1.82%. This indicates that EWSP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ERNA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWSP.L | ERNA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.96% | 1.82% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.50% | 4.89% | +1.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.72% | 6.50% | +3.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.22% | 8.42% | +4.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.22% | 8.73% | +4.49% |
EWSP.L vs. ERNA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWSP.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ERNA.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EWSP.L vs. ERNA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EWSP.L nor ERNA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EWSP.L and ERNA.L have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ERNA.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ERNA.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EWSP.L.
EWSP.L is categorized as S&P 500, while ERNA.L is Corporate Bonds. EWSP.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while ERNA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EWSP.L and 0.09% for ERNA.L.
Find the right allocation for EWSP.L and ERNA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer