EWQ vs. FSZ
EWQ (iShares MSCI France ETF) and FSZ (First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund) are both Europe Equities funds - EWQ tracks the MSCI France Index while FSZ tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Switzerland Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWQ returned 10.16%/yr vs 10.00%/yr for FSZ. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EWQ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FSZ.
Performance
EWQ vs. FSZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWQ achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly higher than FSZ's 5.30% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EWQ having a 10.16% annualized return and FSZ not far behind at 10.00%.
EWQ
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- 6M
- 6.51%
- YTD
- 8.17%
- 1Y
- 16.85%
- 3Y*
- 10.87%
- 5Y*
- 7.54%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.01%
FSZ
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- 5.30%
- 1Y
- 9.45%
- 3Y*
- 12.52%
- 5Y*
- 5.84%
- 10Y*
- 10.00%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.39%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $16.77M | $14.69M | $16.24M | |
| $49.89K | $58.29K | $87.42K |
EWQ vs. FSZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWQ iShares MSCI France ETF | 8.17% | 28.90% | -5.63% | 21.71% | -12.05% | 21.43% | 2.86% | 26.69% | -12.90% | 29.11% |
FSZ First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund | 5.30% | 30.10% | -1.85% | 21.30% | -20.12% | 20.18% | 13.83% | 25.88% | -15.22% | 31.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWQ and FSZ is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2012 | 0.72 |
The correlation between EWQ and FSZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
EWQ vs. FSZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWQ
FSZ
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Technology
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Industrials
EWQ
FSZ
Financial Services
EWQ
FSZ
Consumer Cyclical
EWQ
FSZ
Consumer Defensive
EWQ
FSZ
Healthcare
EWQ
FSZ
Energy
EWQ
FSZ
-
Basic Materials
EWQ
FSZ
Technology
EWQ
FSZ
Communication Services
EWQ
FSZ
Utilities
EWQ
FSZ
Real Estate
EWQ
FSZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWQ vs. FSZ — Risk / Return Rank
EWQ
FSZ
EWQ vs. FSZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI France ETF (EWQ) and First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWQ | FSZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.12 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | 0.91 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.68 | 2.43 | +1.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWQ vs. FSZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWQ drawdown since its inception was -61.41%, which is greater than FSZ's maximum drawdown of -33.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWQ and FSZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWQ | FSZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.41% | -33.97% | -27.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.80% | -10.39% | -3.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.16% | -13.93% | -1.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.46% | -33.96% | +2.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.23% | -33.97% | -5.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.08% | +2.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.01% | -6.96% | -9.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.59% | 3.90% | +0.69% |
Volatility
EWQ vs. FSZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI France ETF (EWQ) is 4.41%, while First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ) has a volatility of 4.96%. This indicates that EWQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWQ | FSZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | 4.96% | -0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.71% | 11.59% | +3.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.38% | 14.51% | +2.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.86% | 19.43% | +0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.40% | 18.72% | +1.68% |
EWQ vs. FSZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWQ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FSZ's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWQ vs. FSZ - Dividend Comparison
EWQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, more than FSZ's 1.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWQ iShares MSCI France ETF | 2.77% | 2.63% | 3.31% | 2.73% | 3.23% | 3.79% | 1.02% | 2.44% | 2.90% | 1.90% | 2.84% | 2.25% |
FSZ First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund | 1.97% | 1.80% | 1.80% | 2.11% | 3.50% | 1.62% | 1.53% | 2.01% | 2.29% | 1.49% | 1.93% | 1.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWQ and FSZ have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSZ has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to EWQ (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWQ dropped -61.41% vs FSZ's -33.97%.
On 10-year performance, EWQ leads with 10.16% vs 10.00% for FSZ. On fees, EWQ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EWQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWQ has performed better with a 10.16% return vs 10.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWQ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FSZ.
EWQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 1.97% for FSZ.
EWQ tracks MSCI France Index, while FSZ tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Switzerland Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWQ and 0.80% for FSZ.
EWQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWQ and FSZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer