PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWQ vs. FLEU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWQ vs. FLEU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI France ETF (EWQ) and Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWQ achieves a 2.89% return, which is significantly lower than FLEU's 7.23% return.


EWQ

1D
1.67%
1M
2.59%
YTD
2.89%
6M
3.97%
1Y
10.46%
3Y*
10.52%
5Y*
6.65%
10Y*
9.27%

FLEU

1D
0.91%
1M
1.11%
YTD
7.23%
6M
10.09%
1Y
18.88%
3Y*
17.01%
5Y*
12.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWQ vs. FLEU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWQ
iShares MSCI France ETF
2.89%28.90%-5.63%21.71%-12.05%21.43%2.86%26.69%-12.90%-0.02%
FLEU
Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF
7.23%41.56%2.26%16.21%-9.14%23.27%0.95%26.94%-8.54%-1.24%

Correlation

The correlation between EWQ and FLEU is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.79

The correlation between EWQ and FLEU shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.91 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWQ vs. FLEU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWQ
FLEU

Industrials

31.7%
21.0%

Financial Services

12.8%
24.8%

Consumer Cyclical

12.0%
8.4%

Healthcare

8.4%
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

8.3%
5.2%

Energy

8.0%
4.0%

Basic Materials

7.0%
4.3%

Technology

4.1%
14.7%

Communication Services

3.0%
3.6%

Utilities

2.6%
7.1%

Real Estate

1.4%
1.2%

Industrials

EWQ
31.7%
FLEU
21.0%

Financial Services

EWQ
12.8%
FLEU
24.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EWQ
12.0%
FLEU
8.4%

Healthcare

EWQ
8.4%
FLEU
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

EWQ
8.3%
FLEU
5.2%

Energy

EWQ
8.0%
FLEU
4.0%

Basic Materials

EWQ
7.0%
FLEU
4.3%

Technology

EWQ
4.1%
FLEU
14.7%

Communication Services

EWQ
3.0%
FLEU
3.6%

Utilities

EWQ
2.6%
FLEU
7.1%

Real Estate

EWQ
1.4%
FLEU
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWQ vs. FLEU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWQ
EWQ Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
EWQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWQ Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
EWQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

FLEU
FLEU Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FLEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLEU Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FLEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLEU Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWQ vs. FLEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI France ETF (EWQ) and Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWQFLEUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.21

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

1.41

-0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.35

5.14

-2.79

EWQ vs. FLEU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the FLEU Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWQ and FLEU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWQFLEUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

1.11

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.74

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.57

-0.30

Drawdowns

EWQ vs. FLEU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWQ drawdown since its inception was -61.41%, which is greater than FLEU's maximum drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWQ and FLEU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWQFLEUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.41%

-33.94%

-27.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.80%

-13.41%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.16%

-15.67%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.46%

-18.67%

-12.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.26%

-0.61%

-3.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.08%

-4.71%

-11.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.46%

3.68%

+0.78%

Volatility

EWQ vs. FLEU - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI France ETF (EWQ) has a higher volatility of 6.50% compared to Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU) at 5.07%. This indicates that EWQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWQFLEUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.50%

5.07%

+1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.62%

14.39%

-0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.21%

17.03%

+0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.79%

16.34%

+3.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.81%

18.25%

+2.56%

EWQ vs. FLEU - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWQ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FLEU's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWQ vs. FLEU - Dividend Comparison

EWQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than FLEU's 2.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWQ
iShares MSCI France ETF
2.55%2.63%3.31%2.73%3.23%3.79%1.02%2.44%2.90%1.90%2.84%2.25%
FLEU
Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF
2.07%2.22%3.18%3.25%21.45%3.03%1.94%6.06%12.17%0.07%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, EWQ and FLEU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EWQ has higher volatility (6.50%) compared to FLEU (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWQ dropped -61.41% vs FLEU's -33.94%.

On 5-year performance, FLEU leads with 12.01% vs 6.65% for EWQ. On fees, FLEU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLEU has been the lower-risk option at 5.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLEU has performed better with a 12.01% return vs 6.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLEU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWQ.

EWQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 2.07% for FLEU.

EWQ tracks MSCI France Index, while FLEU tracks FTSE Developed Eurozone Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWQ and 0.09% for FLEU.

FLEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWQ and FLEU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer