PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWP vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWP vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWP achieves a 6.62% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 11.70% return. Over the past 10 years, EWP has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 11.11%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.62% annualized return.


EWP

1D
0.02%
1M
1.54%
YTD
6.62%
6M
12.03%
1Y
34.29%
3Y*
31.36%
5Y*
17.20%
10Y*
11.11%

IVV

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.70%
6M
12.12%
1Y
29.71%
3Y*
22.74%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWP vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWP
iShares MSCI Spain ETF
6.62%78.03%5.70%30.26%-5.18%0.25%-3.94%11.93%-15.32%26.98%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
11.70%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%

Correlation

The correlation between EWP and IVV is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2000

0.63

The correlation between EWP and IVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (3 years) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWP vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWP
IVV

Financial Services

41.4%
11.8%

Utilities

21.2%
2.4%

Industrials

16.1%
8.3%

Energy

5.3%
3.5%

Technology

4.9%
35.6%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
10.1%

Communication Services

2.9%
11.2%

Real Estate

2.9%
1.9%

Healthcare

1.3%
8.5%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Financial Services

EWP
41.4%
IVV
11.8%

Utilities

EWP
21.2%
IVV
2.4%

Industrials

EWP
16.1%
IVV
8.3%

Energy

EWP
5.3%
IVV
3.5%

Technology

EWP
4.9%
IVV
35.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EWP
4.0%
IVV
10.1%

Communication Services

EWP
2.9%
IVV
11.2%

Real Estate

EWP
2.9%
IVV
1.9%

Healthcare

EWP
1.3%
IVV
8.5%

Basic Materials

EWP

-

IVV
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

EWP

-

IVV
4.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWP vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWP
EWP Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
EWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWP Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
EWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWP Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWP vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWPIVVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.84

2.54

-0.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.48

3.44

-0.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.46

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

3.43

-0.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.33

15.97

-4.64

EWP vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWP Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWP and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWPIVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

2.54

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.85

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.87

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.46

-0.14

Drawdowns

EWP vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWP drawdown since its inception was -61.19%, which is greater than IVV's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWP and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWPIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.19%

-55.25%

-5.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.38%

-8.89%

-2.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.19%

-18.75%

+6.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.91%

-24.53%

-9.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.36%

-33.90%

-12.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

0.00%

-1.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.44%

-10.78%

-10.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

1.91%

+1.28%

Volatility

EWP vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) has a higher volatility of 6.86% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 2.75%. This indicates that EWP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWPIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.86%

2.75%

+4.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.60%

8.87%

+6.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.76%

11.78%

+6.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.24%

16.88%

+3.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.23%

18.05%

+4.18%

EWP vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWP vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

EWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than IVV's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWP
iShares MSCI Spain ETF
2.13%2.27%4.35%2.70%3.07%3.29%2.56%3.72%3.69%2.72%4.65%3.85%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.06%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWP and IVV have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWP has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to IVV (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWP dropped -61.19% vs IVV's -55.25%.

On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.62% vs 11.11% for EWP. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.62% return vs 11.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWP.

EWP has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 1.06% for IVV.

EWP is categorized as Europe Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. EWP tracks MSCI Spain Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWP and 0.03% for IVV.

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWP and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer