PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWP vs. EWD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWP vs. EWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) and iShares MSCI Sweden ETF (EWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWP achieves a 16.77% return, which is significantly higher than EWD's 9.37% return. Over the past 10 years, EWP has outperformed EWD with an annualized return of 12.76%, while EWD has yielded a comparatively lower 10.00% annualized return.


EWP

1D
0.78%
1M
3.86%
6M
10.71%
YTD
16.77%
1Y
43.37%
3Y*
34.09%
5Y*
20.96%
10Y*
12.76%
ALL TIME*
8.78%

EWD

1D
0.48%
1M
4.20%
6M
1.82%
YTD
9.37%
1Y
24.80%
3Y*
18.69%
5Y*
4.82%
10Y*
10.00%
ALL TIME*
8.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$9.77M$18.97M$11.41M
$20.96M$19.84M$20.30M

EWP vs. EWD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWP
iShares MSCI Spain ETF
16.77%78.03%5.70%30.26%-5.18%0.25%-3.94%11.93%-15.32%26.98%
EWD
iShares MSCI Sweden ETF
9.37%36.55%-3.90%25.07%-27.84%22.84%22.27%21.74%-12.78%21.86%

Correlation

The correlation between EWP and EWD is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 1996

0.66

The correlation between EWP and EWD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWP vs. EWD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWP
EWD

Financial Services

43.9%
24.6%

Utilities

21.9%

-

Industrials

16.3%
46.3%

Technology

4.8%
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

4.5%
2.3%

Energy

3.9%

-

Communication Services

2.4%
12.6%

Real Estate

2.4%
1.0%

Healthcare

1.3%
1.2%

Basic Materials

-

2.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.3%

Financial Services

EWP
43.9%
EWD
24.6%

Utilities

EWP
21.9%
EWD

-

Industrials

EWP
16.3%
EWD
46.3%

Technology

EWP
4.8%
EWD
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EWP
4.5%
EWD
2.3%

Energy

EWP
3.9%
EWD

-

Communication Services

EWP
2.4%
EWD
12.6%

Real Estate

EWP
2.4%
EWD
1.0%

Healthcare

EWP
1.3%
EWD
1.2%

Basic Materials

EWP

-

EWD
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

EWP

-

EWD
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWP vs. EWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EWP
EWP Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
EWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWP Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
EWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWP Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

EWD
EWD Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
EWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWD Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
EWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWD Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EWP vs. EWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) and iShares MSCI Sweden ETF (EWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EWPEWDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.21

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

1.72

+2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.64

5.20

+8.44

EWP vs. EWD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWP Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the EWD Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWP and EWD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWP vs. EWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWP drawdown since its inception was -61.19%, smaller than the maximum EWD drawdown of -75.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWP and EWD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWPEWDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.19%

-75.40%

+14.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.38%

-14.49%

+3.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.19%

-17.84%

+5.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.26%

-42.33%

+12.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.36%

-42.33%

-4.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.60%

+1.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.32%

-19.15%

-2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

4.78%

-1.59%

Volatility

EWP vs. EWD - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) has a higher volatility of 5.87% compared to iShares MSCI Sweden ETF (EWD) at 4.80%. This indicates that EWP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWPEWDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.87%

4.80%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.55%

17.10%

-0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.15%

20.11%

-0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.28%

24.02%

-3.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.50%

23.19%

-1.69%

EWP vs. EWD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than EWD's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWP vs. EWD - Dividend Comparison

EWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than EWD's 3.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWD
iShares MSCI Sweden ETF
3.41%3.27%1.77%2.41%3.68%5.46%0.98%4.15%5.17%3.23%3.91%4.08%
EWP
iShares MSCI Spain ETF
2.69%2.27%4.35%2.70%3.07%3.29%2.56%3.72%3.69%2.72%4.65%3.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWP and EWD have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWP has higher volatility (5.87%) compared to EWD (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWP dropped -61.19% vs EWD's -75.40%.

On 10-year performance, EWP leads with 12.76% vs 10.00% for EWD. On fees, EWP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EWD has been the lower-risk option at 4.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWP has performed better with a 12.76% return vs 10.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EWD.

EWD has the higher dividend yield at 3.41%, compared with 2.69% for EWP.

EWP tracks MSCI Spain 25/50 Index (Net), while EWD tracks MSCI Sweden Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWP and 0.55% for EWD.

EWP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWP and EWD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer