EWP vs. EUFN
EWP (iShares MSCI Spain ETF) and EUFN (iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWP is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Spain Index, while EUFN is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Financials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWP returned 12.33%/yr vs 13.48%/yr for EUFN. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EWP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for EUFN.
Performance
EWP vs. EUFN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWP achieves a 8.89% return, which is significantly higher than EUFN's 4.75% return. Over the past 10 years, EWP has underperformed EUFN with an annualized return of 12.33%, while EUFN has yielded a comparatively higher 13.48% annualized return.
EWP
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 4.02%
- YTD
- 8.89%
- 6M
- 11.54%
- 1Y
- 36.89%
- 3Y*
- 32.21%
- 5Y*
- 17.57%
- 10Y*
- 12.33%
EUFN
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 3.32%
- YTD
- 4.75%
- 6M
- 9.10%
- 1Y
- 26.28%
- 3Y*
- 32.04%
- 5Y*
- 18.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.48%
EWP vs. EUFN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWP iShares MSCI Spain ETF | 8.89% | 78.03% | 5.70% | 30.26% | -5.18% | 0.25% | -3.94% | 11.93% | -15.32% | 26.98% |
EUFN iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF | 4.75% | 65.73% | 17.20% | 26.15% | -8.78% | 19.13% | -8.55% | 20.73% | -23.14% | 26.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWP and EUFN is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2010 | 0.86 |
The correlation between EWP and EUFN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
EWP vs. EUFN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWP
EUFN
Financial Services
Utilities
-
Industrials
Energy
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
EWP
EUFN
Utilities
EWP
EUFN
-
Industrials
EWP
EUFN
Energy
EWP
EUFN
-
Technology
EWP
EUFN
Consumer Cyclical
EWP
EUFN
Communication Services
EWP
EUFN
-
Real Estate
EWP
EUFN
-
Healthcare
EWP
EUFN
-
Basic Materials
EWP
-
EUFN
-
Consumer Defensive
EWP
-
EUFN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWP vs. EUFN — Risk / Return Rank
EWP
EUFN
EWP vs. EUFN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) and iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWP | EUFN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.23 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | 1.79 | +1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.51 | 6.24 | +5.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWP vs. EUFN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWP drawdown since its inception was -61.19%, which is greater than EUFN's maximum drawdown of -53.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWP and EUFN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWP | EUFN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.19% | -53.25% | -7.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.38% | -14.77% | +3.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.19% | -15.95% | +3.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.91% | -35.15% | +1.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.36% | -53.25% | +6.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.10% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.41% | -14.53% | -6.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.22% | 4.23% | -1.01% |
Volatility
EWP vs. EUFN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) is 6.21%, while iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN) has a volatility of 6.96%. This indicates that EWP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUFN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWP | EUFN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.21% | 6.96% | -0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.09% | 17.05% | -0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.13% | 20.17% | -1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.31% | 21.88% | -1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.22% | 24.53% | -2.31% |
EWP vs. EUFN - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EUFN's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWP vs. EUFN - Dividend Comparison
EWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than EUFN's 3.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUFN iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF | 3.41% | 3.57% | 5.36% | 5.00% | 4.24% | 4.15% | 1.38% | 4.55% | 6.48% | 3.04% | 4.03% | 3.65% |
EWP iShares MSCI Spain ETF | 2.09% | 2.27% | 4.35% | 2.70% | 3.07% | 3.29% | 2.56% | 3.72% | 3.69% | 2.72% | 4.65% | 3.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, EWP and EUFN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EUFN has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to EWP (6.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWP dropped -61.19% vs EUFN's -53.25%.
On 10-year performance, EUFN leads with 13.48% vs 12.33% for EWP. On fees, EUFN is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, EWP has been the lower-risk option at 6.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EUFN has performed better with a 13.48% return vs 12.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EUFN is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWP.
EUFN has the higher dividend yield at 3.41%, compared with 2.09% for EWP.
EWP is categorized as Europe Equities, while EUFN is Financials Equities. EWP tracks MSCI Spain Index, while EUFN tracks MSCI Europe Financials Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWP and 0.48% for EUFN.
EWP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWP and EUFN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer