PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWMCX vs. IOLZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWMCX vs. IOLZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Evercore Equity Fund (EWMCX) and ICON Equity Fund (IOLZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWMCX achieves a 7.89% return, which is significantly lower than IOLZX's 30.88% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EWMCX having a 15.10% annualized return and IOLZX not far ahead at 15.49%.


EWMCX

1D
-0.49%
1M
-0.05%
YTD
7.89%
6M
6.88%
1Y
21.79%
3Y*
15.82%
5Y*
9.56%
10Y*
15.10%

IOLZX

1D
0.36%
1M
7.28%
YTD
30.88%
6M
29.23%
1Y
53.97%
3Y*
25.06%
5Y*
11.89%
10Y*
15.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWMCX vs. IOLZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWMCX
Evercore Equity Fund
7.89%11.21%14.29%27.95%-21.16%29.39%24.17%38.45%-4.94%25.35%
IOLZX
ICON Equity Fund
30.88%15.81%16.87%12.13%-17.78%26.72%16.00%38.22%-16.69%26.78%

Correlation

The correlation between EWMCX and IOLZX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2004

0.87

The correlation between EWMCX and IOLZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWMCX vs. IOLZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWMCX
EWMCX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
EWMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
EWMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

IOLZX
IOLZX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IOLZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IOLZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IOLZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
IOLZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
IOLZX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWMCX vs. IOLZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evercore Equity Fund (EWMCX) and ICON Equity Fund (IOLZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EWMCXIOLZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.48

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

3.91

-1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.17

13.84

-4.67

EWMCX vs. IOLZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWMCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is lower than the IOLZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWMCX and IOLZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWMCX vs. IOLZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWMCX drawdown since its inception was -69.57%, which is greater than IOLZX's maximum drawdown of -56.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWMCX and IOLZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWMCXIOLZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.57%

-56.03%

-13.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.38%

-14.35%

+3.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.78%

-24.71%

+5.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.47%

-27.77%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.00%

-41.04%

+8.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

0.00%

-0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.56%

-12.61%

-4.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

4.05%

-1.56%

Volatility

EWMCX vs. IOLZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Evercore Equity Fund (EWMCX) is 4.58%, while ICON Equity Fund (IOLZX) has a volatility of 7.17%. This indicates that EWMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IOLZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWMCXIOLZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

7.17%

-2.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.30%

15.88%

-4.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.09%

19.60%

-5.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.68%

21.54%

-3.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.84%

22.43%

-3.59%

EWMCX vs. IOLZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWMCX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than IOLZX's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWMCX vs. IOLZX - Dividend Comparison

EWMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, less than IOLZX's 8.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWMCX
Evercore Equity Fund
4.98%5.38%3.55%0.52%0.56%3.14%0.92%2.26%2.25%1.83%0.30%4.97%
IOLZX
ICON Equity Fund
8.17%10.69%22.21%4.75%18.57%14.12%0.00%3.46%1.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWMCX and IOLZX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IOLZX has higher volatility (7.17%) compared to EWMCX (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWMCX dropped -69.57% vs IOLZX's -56.03%.

IOLZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWMCX and IOLZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer