PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWMCX vs. CHASX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWMCX vs. CHASX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Evercore Equity Fund (EWMCX) and Chase Growth Fund (CHASX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWMCX achieves a 7.99% return, which is significantly lower than CHASX's 26.84% return. Over the past 10 years, EWMCX has underperformed CHASX with an annualized return of 14.65%, while CHASX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.37% annualized return.


EWMCX

1D
-0.33%
1M
1.81%
YTD
7.99%
6M
7.13%
1Y
22.82%
3Y*
16.16%
5Y*
9.83%
10Y*
14.65%

CHASX

1D
0.70%
1M
7.92%
YTD
26.84%
6M
27.99%
1Y
53.84%
3Y*
42.38%
5Y*
22.68%
10Y*
20.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWMCX vs. CHASX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWMCX
Evercore Equity Fund
7.99%11.21%14.29%27.95%-21.16%29.39%24.17%38.45%-4.94%25.35%
CHASX
Chase Growth Fund
26.84%20.61%64.71%25.91%-20.41%22.32%18.27%42.63%-3.96%24.49%

Correlation

The correlation between EWMCX and CHASX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 1997

0.86

The correlation between EWMCX and CHASX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.88 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWMCX vs. CHASX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWMCX
EWMCX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
EWMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
EWMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

CHASX
CHASX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CHASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHASX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CHASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHASX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWMCX vs. CHASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evercore Equity Fund (EWMCX) and Chase Growth Fund (CHASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWMCXCHASXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.74

3.19

-1.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.44

4.09

-1.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.54

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

5.63

-3.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.51

24.23

-14.72

EWMCX vs. CHASX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWMCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is lower than the CHASX Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWMCX and CHASX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWMCXCHASXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

3.19

-1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

1.13

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

1.03

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.63

-0.21

Drawdowns

EWMCX vs. CHASX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWMCX drawdown since its inception was -69.57%, which is greater than CHASX's maximum drawdown of -45.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWMCX and CHASX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWMCXCHASXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.57%

-45.94%

-23.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.38%

-9.90%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.78%

-23.40%

+4.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.47%

-24.63%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.00%

-30.40%

-2.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

0.00%

-0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.58%

-9.15%

-8.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

2.30%

+0.18%

Volatility

EWMCX vs. CHASX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Evercore Equity Fund (EWMCX) is 3.25%, while Chase Growth Fund (CHASX) has a volatility of 5.51%. This indicates that EWMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHASX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWMCXCHASXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.25%

5.51%

-2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.67%

13.68%

-3.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.61%

17.47%

-3.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.59%

20.23%

-2.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.80%

19.88%

-1.08%

EWMCX vs. CHASX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWMCX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than CHASX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWMCX vs. CHASX - Dividend Comparison

EWMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, less than CHASX's 7.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHASX
Chase Growth Fund
7.19%9.12%36.67%5.80%5.49%20.15%7.83%22.82%12.92%11.92%9.14%10.24%
EWMCX
Evercore Equity Fund
4.98%5.38%3.55%0.52%0.56%3.14%0.92%2.26%2.25%1.83%0.30%4.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWMCX and CHASX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHASX has higher volatility (5.51%) compared to EWMCX (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWMCX dropped -69.57% vs CHASX's -45.94%.

CHASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWMCX and CHASX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer