EWL vs. FCNTX

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

EWL (iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF) and FCNTX (Fidelity Contrafund) are both funds - EWL is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Switzerland Index, while FCNTX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, EWL returned 10.14%/yr vs 17.48%/yr for FCNTX. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FCNTX.

Performance

EWL vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWL achieves a 4.60% return, which is significantly lower than FCNTX's 6.65% return. Over the past 10 years, EWL has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 10.14%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.48% annualized return.

EWL

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 1.55%
• YTD: 4.60%
• 6M: 7.45%
• 1Y: 13.57%
• 3Y*: 12.47%
• 5Y*: 6.50%
• 10Y*: 10.14%

FCNTX

• 1D: 1.81%
• 1M: -0.15%
• YTD: 6.65%
• 6M: 7.93%
• 1Y: 20.59%
• 3Y*: 26.12%
• 5Y*: 14.41%
• 10Y*: 17.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWL vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EWL iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF	4.60%	32.92%	-2.80%	17.67%	-18.89%	20.20%	11.80%	31.58%	-9.21%	23.34%
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	6.65%	21.76%	36.00%	38.67%	-28.31%	24.52%	32.48%	30.00%	-3.81%	32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between EWL and FCNTX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 1996	0.55

The correlation between EWL and FCNTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (3 years) to 0.58 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWL vs. FCNTX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EWL	FCNTX
Healthcare	38.8%	9.2%
Financial Services	18.6%	13.8%
Consumer Defensive	14.9%	3.7%
Industrials	12.0%	8.6%
Basic Materials	6.6%	2.1%
Consumer Cyclical	5.4%	10.1%
Communication Services	1.3%	21.2%
Real Estate	0.9%	0.1%
Technology	0.9%	27.0%
Utilities	0.4%	0.5%
Energy	-	3.6%

Return for Risk

EWL vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWL

EWL Risk / Return Rank: 26
EWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
EWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
EWL Omega Ratio Rank: 25
EWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
EWL Martin Ratio Rank: 27

FCNTX

FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 40
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWL vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EWL	FCNTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	1.45	-0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.30	2.01	-0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.26	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.01	1.86	-0.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.24	7.80	-4.56

EWL vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWL Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWL and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EWL vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWL drawdown since its inception was -51.62%, roughly equal to the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWL and FCNTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EWL	FCNTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.62%	-49.19%	-2.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.48%	-11.30%	-2.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.48%	-19.75%	+6.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.99%	-32.59%	+3.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.99%	-32.59%	+3.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.63%	-2.41%	-1.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.08%	-8.16%	-2.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.22%	2.69%	+1.53%

Volatility

EWL vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) have volatilities of 5.12% and 5.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EWL	FCNTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.12%	5.07%	+0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.70%	11.16%	+1.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.09%	14.53%	+1.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.13%	19.23%	-3.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.47%	19.71%	-3.24%

EWL vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

EWL vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

EWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than FCNTX's 4.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EWL iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF	1.63%	1.71%	2.21%	2.12%	2.04%	1.73%	1.45%	1.85%	2.56%	2.05%	2.75%	2.58%
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	4.38%	5.21%	4.19%	3.78%	11.87%	10.80%	8.01%	4.16%	7.46%	6.08%	3.81%	5.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EWL and FCNTX in my portfolio?

EWL and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EWL or FCNTX?

EWL has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to FCNTX (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWL dropped -51.62% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCNTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.