EWD vs. EWP
EWD (iShares MSCI Sweden ETF) and EWP (iShares MSCI Spain ETF) are both Europe Equities funds from iShares - EWD tracks the MSCI Sweden Index while EWP tracks the MSCI Spain Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWD returned 9.23%/yr vs 10.99%/yr for EWP. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWD charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EWP.
Performance
EWD vs. EWP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWD achieves a 4.90% return, which is significantly lower than EWP's 5.49% return. Over the past 10 years, EWD has underperformed EWP with an annualized return of 9.23%, while EWP has yielded a comparatively higher 10.99% annualized return.
EWD
- 1D
- -2.16%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 4.90%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 18.29%
- 3Y*
- 16.43%
- 5Y*
- 4.25%
- 10Y*
- 9.23%
EWP
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- 5.49%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 34.73%
- 3Y*
- 30.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.03%
- 10Y*
- 10.99%
EWD vs. EWP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWD iShares MSCI Sweden ETF | 4.90% | 36.55% | -3.90% | 25.07% | -27.84% | 22.84% | 22.27% | 21.74% | -12.78% | 21.86% |
EWP iShares MSCI Spain ETF | 5.49% | 78.03% | 5.70% | 30.26% | -5.18% | 0.25% | -3.94% | 11.93% | -15.32% | 26.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWD and EWP is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 1996 | 0.66 |
The correlation between EWD and EWP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
EWD vs. EWP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWD
EWP
Industrials
Financial Services
Communication Services
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
EWD
EWP
Financial Services
EWD
EWP
Communication Services
EWD
EWP
Technology
EWD
EWP
Basic Materials
EWD
EWP
-
Consumer Cyclical
EWD
EWP
Consumer Defensive
EWD
EWP
-
Healthcare
EWD
EWP
Real Estate
EWD
EWP
Energy
EWD
-
EWP
Utilities
EWD
-
EWP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWD vs. EWP — Risk / Return Rank
EWD
EWP
EWD vs. EWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Sweden ETF (EWD) and iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWD | EWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.33 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | 3.07 | -1.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.35 | 10.91 | -6.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWD | EWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 1.87 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.85 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.50 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.31 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
EWD vs. EWP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWD drawdown since its inception was -75.40%, which is greater than EWP's maximum drawdown of -61.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWD and EWP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWD | EWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.40% | -61.19% | -14.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.49% | -11.38% | -3.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.84% | -12.19% | -5.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.33% | -33.91% | -8.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.33% | -46.36% | +4.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.63% | -2.60% | -3.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.22% | -21.43% | +2.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.21% | 3.19% | +1.02% |
Volatility
EWD vs. EWP - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Sweden ETF (EWD) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) at 6.12%. This indicates that EWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWD | EWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 6.12% | +1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.45% | 15.64% | +0.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.74% | 18.76% | +0.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.92% | 20.24% | +3.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.50% | 22.23% | +1.27% |
EWD vs. EWP - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than EWP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWD vs. EWP - Dividend Comparison
EWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than EWP's 2.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWD iShares MSCI Sweden ETF | 3.12% | 3.27% | 1.77% | 2.41% | 3.68% | 5.46% | 0.98% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 3.23% | 3.91% | 4.08% |
EWP iShares MSCI Spain ETF | 2.15% | 2.27% | 4.35% | 2.70% | 3.07% | 3.29% | 2.56% | 3.72% | 3.69% | 2.72% | 4.65% | 3.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWD and EWP have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWD has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to EWP (6.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWD dropped -75.40% vs EWP's -61.19%.
On 10-year performance, EWP leads with 10.99% vs 9.23% for EWD. On fees, EWP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EWP has been the lower-risk option at 6.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWP has performed better with a 10.99% return vs 9.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EWD.
EWD has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 2.15% for EWP.
EWD tracks MSCI Sweden Index, while EWP tracks MSCI Spain Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for EWD and 0.50% for EWP.
EWP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWD and EWP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer