PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWD vs. EUDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWD vs. EUDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Sweden ETF (EWD) and WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund (EUDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWD achieves a 6.28% return, which is significantly higher than EUDG's 3.50% return. Over the past 10 years, EWD has outperformed EUDG with an annualized return of 9.31%, while EUDG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.07% annualized return.


EWD

1D
1.32%
1M
2.83%
YTD
6.28%
6M
10.14%
1Y
17.94%
3Y*
17.14%
5Y*
4.52%
10Y*
9.31%

EUDG

1D
1.54%
1M
2.57%
YTD
3.50%
6M
6.30%
1Y
12.59%
3Y*
11.32%
5Y*
5.05%
10Y*
8.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWD vs. EUDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWD
iShares MSCI Sweden ETF
6.28%36.55%-3.90%25.07%-27.84%22.84%22.27%21.74%-12.78%21.86%
EUDG
WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund
3.50%28.94%-4.30%19.36%-18.24%16.87%11.29%28.52%-15.19%29.66%

Correlation

The correlation between EWD and EUDG is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2014

0.82

The correlation between EWD and EUDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWD vs. EUDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWD
EUDG

Industrials

46.5%
23.8%

Financial Services

24.1%
15.2%

Communication Services

12.3%
4.3%

Technology

7.2%
5.1%

Basic Materials

3.2%
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

2.4%
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
12.2%

Healthcare

1.2%
17.7%

Real Estate

1.2%
0.1%

Energy

-

4.4%

Utilities

-

1.8%

Industrials

EWD
46.5%
EUDG
23.8%

Financial Services

EWD
24.1%
EUDG
15.2%

Communication Services

EWD
12.3%
EUDG
4.3%

Technology

EWD
7.2%
EUDG
5.1%

Basic Materials

EWD
3.2%
EUDG
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EWD
2.4%
EUDG
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

EWD
2.1%
EUDG
12.2%

Healthcare

EWD
1.2%
EUDG
17.7%

Real Estate

EWD
1.2%
EUDG
0.1%

Energy

EWD

-

EUDG
4.4%

Utilities

EWD

-

EUDG
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWD vs. EUDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWD
EWD Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
EWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWD Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
EWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWD Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

EUDG
EUDG Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
EUDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUDG Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
EUDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUDG Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWD vs. EUDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Sweden ETF (EWD) and WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund (EUDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWDEUDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.15

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

1.04

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.26

3.38

+0.88

EWD vs. EUDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWD Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the EUDG Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWD and EUDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWDEUDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

0.83

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.30

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.46

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.35

-0.07

Drawdowns

EWD vs. EUDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWD drawdown since its inception was -75.40%, which is greater than EUDG's maximum drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWD and EUDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWDEUDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.40%

-33.76%

-41.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.49%

-12.20%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.84%

-13.73%

-4.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.33%

-33.30%

-9.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.33%

-33.76%

-8.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.39%

-3.53%

-0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.22%

-7.72%

-11.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.22%

3.73%

+0.49%

Volatility

EWD vs. EUDG - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Sweden ETF (EWD) has a higher volatility of 7.28% compared to WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund (EUDG) at 5.24%. This indicates that EWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWDEUDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.28%

5.24%

+2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.50%

12.44%

+4.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.76%

15.19%

+4.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.93%

16.69%

+7.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.50%

17.70%

+5.80%

EWD vs. EUDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than EUDG's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWD vs. EUDG - Dividend Comparison

EWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, more than EUDG's 2.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUDG
WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund
2.21%2.19%2.41%2.14%3.07%2.98%1.87%2.30%3.00%1.55%2.49%2.10%
EWD
iShares MSCI Sweden ETF
3.08%3.27%1.77%2.41%3.68%5.46%0.98%4.15%5.17%3.23%3.91%4.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWD and EUDG have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWD has higher volatility (7.28%) compared to EUDG (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWD dropped -75.40% vs EUDG's -33.76%.

On 10-year performance, EWD leads with 9.31% vs 8.07% for EUDG. On fees, EWD is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, EUDG has been the lower-risk option at 5.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWD has performed better with a 9.31% return vs 8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWD is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for EUDG.

EWD has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 2.21% for EUDG.

EWD tracks MSCI Sweden Index, while EUDG tracks WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for EWD and 0.58% for EUDG.

EWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWD and EUDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer