EWD vs. BBEU
EWD (iShares MSCI Sweden ETF) and BBEU (JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - EWD tracks the MSCI Sweden Index while BBEU tracks the Morningstar Developed Europe Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EWD returned 4.52%/yr vs 9.03%/yr for BBEU. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EWD charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for BBEU.
Performance
EWD vs. BBEU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWD achieves a 6.28% return, which is significantly lower than BBEU's 6.77% return.
EWD
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- 2.83%
- YTD
- 6.28%
- 6M
- 10.14%
- 1Y
- 17.94%
- 3Y*
- 17.14%
- 5Y*
- 4.52%
- 10Y*
- 9.31%
BBEU
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 2.36%
- YTD
- 6.77%
- 6M
- 9.98%
- 1Y
- 18.96%
- 3Y*
- 17.22%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- —
EWD vs. BBEU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWD iShares MSCI Sweden ETF | 6.28% | 36.55% | -3.90% | 25.07% | -27.84% | 22.84% | 22.27% | 21.74% | -9.33% |
BBEU JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF | 6.77% | 36.37% | 1.85% | 20.31% | -14.72% | 17.50% | 5.00% | 23.96% | -13.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWD and BBEU is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018 | 0.88 |
The correlation between EWD and BBEU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
EWD vs. BBEU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWD
BBEU
Industrials
Financial Services
Communication Services
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
EWD
BBEU
Financial Services
EWD
BBEU
Communication Services
EWD
BBEU
Technology
EWD
BBEU
Basic Materials
EWD
BBEU
Consumer Cyclical
EWD
BBEU
Consumer Defensive
EWD
BBEU
Healthcare
EWD
BBEU
Real Estate
EWD
BBEU
Energy
EWD
-
BBEU
Utilities
EWD
-
BBEU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWD vs. BBEU — Risk / Return Rank
EWD
BBEU
EWD vs. BBEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Sweden ETF (EWD) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWD | BBEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.22 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.24 | 1.56 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.26 | 5.78 | -1.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWD | BBEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 1.23 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.52 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.48 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
EWD vs. BBEU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWD drawdown since its inception was -75.40%, which is greater than BBEU's maximum drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWD and BBEU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWD | BBEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.40% | -36.27% | -39.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.49% | -12.23% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.84% | -14.23% | -3.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.33% | -31.08% | -11.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.39% | -1.50% | -2.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.22% | -6.14% | -13.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.22% | 3.29% | +0.93% |
Volatility
EWD vs. BBEU - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Sweden ETF (EWD) has a higher volatility of 7.28% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU) at 5.55%. This indicates that EWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWD | BBEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.28% | 5.55% | +1.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.50% | 13.02% | +3.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.76% | 15.51% | +4.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.93% | 17.50% | +6.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.50% | 19.32% | +4.18% |
EWD vs. BBEU - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than BBEU's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWD vs. BBEU - Dividend Comparison
EWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, more than BBEU's 2.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBEU JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF | 2.78% | 2.83% | 4.16% | 2.94% | 4.72% | 2.63% | 2.29% | 3.24% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EWD iShares MSCI Sweden ETF | 3.08% | 3.27% | 1.77% | 2.41% | 3.68% | 5.46% | 0.98% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 3.23% | 3.91% | 4.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWD and BBEU have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWD has higher volatility (7.28%) compared to BBEU (5.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWD dropped -75.40% vs BBEU's -36.27%.
On 5-year performance, BBEU leads with 9.03% vs 4.52% for EWD. On fees, BBEU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, BBEU has been the lower-risk option at 5.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBEU has performed better with a 9.03% return vs 4.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBEU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EWD.
EWD has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 2.78% for BBEU.
EWD tracks MSCI Sweden Index, while BBEU tracks Morningstar Developed Europe Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for EWD and 0.09% for BBEU.
BBEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWD and BBEU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer