PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVYM vs. NHYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVYM vs. NHYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF (EVYM) and Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF (NHYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVYM achieves a 3.53% return, which is significantly higher than NHYM's 2.94% return.


EVYM

1D
0.23%
1M
1.19%
YTD
3.53%
6M
4.17%
1Y
10.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NHYM

1D
0.17%
1M
1.24%
YTD
2.94%
6M
3.46%
1Y
8.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVYM vs. NHYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EVYM and NHYM is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2025

0.74

The correlation between EVYM and NHYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVYM vs. NHYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVYM
EVYM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EVYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVYM Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
EVYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

NHYM
NHYM Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NHYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NHYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
NHYM Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NHYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
NHYM Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVYM vs. NHYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF (EVYM) and Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF (NHYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EVYMNHYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.39

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

2.96

+0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.36

8.68

+5.68

EVYM vs. NHYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVYM Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is higher than the NHYM Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVYM and NHYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVYMNHYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85

1.89

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.78

+0.18

Drawdowns

EVYM vs. NHYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVYM drawdown since its inception was -6.08%, roughly equal to the maximum NHYM drawdown of -6.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVYM and NHYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVYMNHYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.08%

-6.11%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.77%

-2.77%

0.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.48%

-1.73%

+0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

0.95%

-0.22%

Volatility

EVYM vs. NHYM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF (EVYM) is 0.95%, while Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF (NHYM) has a volatility of 1.35%. This indicates that EVYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NHYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVYMNHYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.95%

1.35%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.57%

2.61%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.69%

4.39%

-0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.07%

5.92%

+0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.07%

5.92%

+0.15%

EVYM vs. NHYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVYM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than NHYM's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

EVYM vs. NHYM - Dividend Comparison

EVYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, more than NHYM's 4.52% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


EVYM and NHYM have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NHYM has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to EVYM (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVYM dropped -6.08% vs NHYM's -6.11%.

On 1-year performance, EVYM leads with 10.47% vs 8.17% for NHYM. On fees, NHYM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, EVYM has been the lower-risk option at 0.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EVYM has performed better with a 10.47% return vs 8.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NHYM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for EVYM.

EVYM has the higher dividend yield at 4.77%, compared with 4.52% for NHYM.

They also come from different issuers: Eaton Vance and Nuveen. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for EVYM and 0.35% for NHYM.

EVYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVYM and NHYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer