PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVT.DE vs. HPJS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVT.DE vs. HPJS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Evotec SE (EVT.DE) and HSBC MSCI Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (HPJS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EVT.DE is traded in EUR, while HPJS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HPJS.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVT.DE achieves a -14.31% return, which is significantly lower than HPJS.L's 14.74% return.


EVT.DE

1D
0.86%
1M
-10.71%
YTD
-14.31%
6M
-10.19%
1Y
-28.59%
3Y*
-39.65%
5Y*
-33.75%
10Y*
2.44%

HPJS.L

1D
-0.37%
1M
5.93%
YTD
14.74%
6M
15.65%
1Y
30.03%
3Y*
9.29%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVT.DE vs. HPJS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EVT.DE
Evotec SE
-14.31%-33.54%-61.47%39.45%-64.09%2.31%
HPJS.L
HSBC MSCI Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF
14.74%8.99%3.24%12.23%-19.38%-25.72%

Correlation

The correlation between EVT.DE and HPJS.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVT.DE vs. HPJS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVT.DE
EVT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
EVT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
EVT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

HPJS.L
HPJS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
HPJS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HPJS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
HPJS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
HPJS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
HPJS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVT.DE vs. HPJS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evotec SE (EVT.DE) and HSBC MSCI Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (HPJS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EVT.DEHPJS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.28

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.64

1.04

-1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.16

1.59

-2.74

EVT.DE vs. HPJS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVT.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the HPJS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVT.DE and HPJS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EVT.DE vs. HPJS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVT.DE drawdown since its inception was -90.92%, which is greater than HPJS.L's maximum drawdown of -45.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVT.DE and HPJS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVT.DEHPJS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.92%

-45.31%

-45.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.77%

-27.25%

-17.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-83.00%

-27.25%

-55.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.70%

-17.09%

-72.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.10%

-34.07%

-5.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.72%

17.90%

+6.82%

Volatility

EVT.DE vs. HPJS.L - Volatility Comparison

Evotec SE (EVT.DE) has a higher volatility of 12.08% compared to HSBC MSCI Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (HPJS.L) at 5.33%. This indicates that EVT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HPJS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVT.DEHPJS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.08%

5.33%

+6.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.58%

15.49%

+24.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.52%

45.34%

+8.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.96%

27.96%

+30.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.34%

27.96%

+23.38%

Dividends

EVT.DE vs. HPJS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EVT.DE nor HPJS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EVT.DE and HPJS.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVT.DE and HPJS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer