EVSM vs. QPUX
EVSM (Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Income ETF) and QPUX (Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EVSM is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA 1-3 Year Municipal Securities Index, while QPUX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance. EVSM is passively managed, while QPUX is actively managed. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EVSM charges 0.19%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for QPUX.
Performance
EVSM vs. QPUX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EVSM achieves a 1.15% return, which is significantly higher than QPUX's -7.70% return.
EVSM
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 1.15%
- 6M
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- 4.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QPUX
- 1D
- -15.07%
- 1M
- 59.73%
- YTD
- -7.70%
- 6M
- -29.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EVSM vs. QPUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EVSM Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Income ETF | 1.15% | 1.46% |
QPUX Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF | -7.70% | -15.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between EVSM and QPUX is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2025 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EVSM vs. QPUX — Risk / Return Rank
EVSM
QPUX
EVSM vs. QPUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (EVSM) and Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF (QPUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EVSM | QPUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.70 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.52 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EVSM | QPUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.89 | -0.14 | +2.03 |
Drawdowns
EVSM vs. QPUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EVSM drawdown since its inception was -1.50%, smaller than the maximum QPUX drawdown of -94.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVSM and QPUX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EVSM | QPUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.50% | -94.73% | +93.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -81.69% | +81.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.24% | -63.48% | +63.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.30% | — | — |
Volatility
EVSM vs. QPUX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EVSM | QPUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.33% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.83% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27% | 194.76% | -193.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.92% | 194.76% | -192.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.92% | 194.76% | -192.84% |
EVSM vs. QPUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EVSM has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than QPUX's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
EVSM vs. QPUX - Dividend Comparison
EVSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, while QPUX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
EVSM Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Income ETF | 3.00% | 3.12% | 2.99% |
QPUX Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EVSM and QPUX have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EVSM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EVSM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for QPUX.
EVSM has the higher dividend yield at 3.00%, compared with 0.00% for QPUX.
EVSM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while QPUX is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Eaton Vance and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EVSM and 1.29% for QPUX.
Find the right allocation for EVSM and QPUX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer