EVSM vs. QBF

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

EVSM (Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Income ETF) and QBF (Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly) are both exchange-traded funds - EVSM is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA 1-3 Year Municipal Securities Index, while QBF is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Innovator. EVSM is passively managed, while QBF is actively managed. Over the past year, EVSM returned 3.37% vs -44.02% for QBF. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EVSM charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QBF.

Performance

EVSM vs. QBF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (EVSM) and Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly (QBF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVSM achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly higher than QBF's -27.34% return.

EVSM

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -0.00%
• 6M: 0.82%
• YTD: 1.27%
• 1Y: 3.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QBF

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: -5.16%
• 6M: -31.33%
• YTD: -27.34%
• 1Y: -44.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVSM vs. QBF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EVSM Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Income ETF	1.27%	3.49%
QBF Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly	-27.34%	-14.76%

Correlation

The correlation between EVSM and QBF is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025	0.02

Return for Risk

EVSM vs. QBF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVSM

EVSM Risk / Return Rank: 87
EVSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
EVSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
EVSM Omega Ratio Rank: 94
EVSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
EVSM Martin Ratio Rank: 76

QBF

QBF Risk / Return Rank: 0
QBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
QBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
QBF Omega Ratio Rank: 0
QBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
QBF Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVSM vs. QBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (EVSM) and Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly (QBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EVSM	QBF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.64	-1.63	+4.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.05	-2.57	+6.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	0.73	+0.82
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.15	-0.91	+4.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.15	-1.53	+12.68

EVSM vs. QBF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVSM Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is higher than the QBF Sharpe Ratio of -1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVSM and QBF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EVSM vs. QBF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVSM drawdown since its inception was -1.50%, smaller than the maximum QBF drawdown of -48.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVSM and QBF.

Drawdown Indicators

	EVSM	QBF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.50%	-48.71%	+47.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.07%	-48.71%	+47.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	-45.69%	+45.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.23%	-19.10%	+18.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.30%	28.73%	-28.43%

Volatility

EVSM vs. QBF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (EVSM) is 0.39%, while Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly (QBF) has a volatility of 8.71%. This indicates that EVSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QBF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EVSM	QBF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.39%	8.71%	-8.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.88%	20.81%	-19.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.28%	27.23%	-25.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.90%	28.98%	-27.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.90%	28.98%	-27.08%

EVSM vs. QBF - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVSM has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than QBF's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

EVSM vs. QBF - Dividend Comparison

EVSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, more than QBF's 1.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
EVSM Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Income ETF	3.00%	3.12%	2.99%
QBF Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly	1.90%	1.38%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EVSM and QBF in my portfolio?

EVSM and QBF have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EVSM or QBF?

QBF has higher volatility (8.71%) compared to EVSM (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVSM dropped -1.50% vs QBF's -48.71%.

Which ETF is better, EVSM or QBF?

On 1-year performance, EVSM leads with 3.37% vs -44.02% for QBF. On fees, EVSM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, EVSM has been the lower-risk option at 0.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EVSM or QBF?

Over the 1-year period, EVSM has performed better with a 3.37% return vs -44.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EVSM or QBF?

EVSM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QBF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EVSM or QBF?

EVSM has the higher dividend yield at 3.00%, compared with 1.90% for QBF.

What is the main difference between EVSM and QBF?

EVSM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while QBF is Blockchain. They also come from different issuers: Eaton Vance and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EVSM and 0.79% for QBF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EVSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs -1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.