EVSD vs. FDVV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EVSD (Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF) and FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EVSD is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Eaton Vance, while FDVV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Core Dividend Index. EVSD is actively managed, while FDVV is passively managed. Over the past year, EVSD returned 4.84% vs 23.45% for FDVV. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EVSD charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FDVV.

Performance

EVSD vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF (EVSD) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVSD achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly lower than FDVV's 8.39% return.

EVSD

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 0.32%
• YTD: 0.77%
• 6M: 1.16%
• 1Y: 4.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FDVV

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: 4.44%
• YTD: 8.39%
• 6M: 8.67%
• 1Y: 23.45%
• 3Y*: 20.08%
• 5Y*: 13.36%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVSD vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EVSD Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF	0.77%	6.80%	3.87%
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	8.39%	17.08%	7.81%

Correlation

The correlation between EVSD and FDVV is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2024	0.21

The correlation between EVSD and FDVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EVSD vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVSD

EVSD Risk / Return Rank: 87
EVSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
EVSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
EVSD Omega Ratio Rank: 93
EVSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
EVSD Martin Ratio Rank: 81

FDVV

FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 64
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 71
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVSD vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF (EVSD) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EVSD	FDVV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.16	2.35	+0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.08	3.28	+1.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.67	1.43	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.86	2.53	+1.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.16	10.54	+5.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EVSD vs. FDVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVSD Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is higher than the FDVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVSD and FDVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EVSD	FDVV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.16	2.35	+0.82
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.91	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.03	0.79	+2.24

Drawdowns

EVSD vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVSD drawdown since its inception was -1.26%, smaller than the maximum FDVV drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVSD and FDVV.

Drawdown Indicators

	EVSD	FDVV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.26%	-40.25%	+38.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.26%	-9.30%	+8.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.90%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	-1.12%	+0.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.19%	-3.81%	+3.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.30%	2.23%	-1.93%

Volatility

EVSD vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF (EVSD) is 0.47%, while Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) has a volatility of 3.14%. This indicates that EVSD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EVSD	FDVV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.47%	3.14%	-2.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.14%	7.99%	-6.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.54%	10.06%	-8.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.94%	14.75%	-12.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.94%	17.00%	-15.06%

EVSD vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVSD has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

EVSD vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison

EVSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than FDVV's 2.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EVSD Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF	4.62%	4.64%	2.91%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	2.72%	2.89%	2.94%	3.77%	3.44%	2.70%	3.19%	3.93%	4.05%	3.66%	1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EVSD and FDVV in my portfolio?

EVSD and FDVV have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EVSD or FDVV?

FDVV has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to EVSD (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVSD dropped -1.26% vs FDVV's -40.25%.

Which ETF is better, EVSD or FDVV?

On 1-year performance, FDVV leads with 23.45% vs 4.84% for EVSD. On fees, EVSD is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, EVSD has been the lower-risk option at 0.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EVSD or FDVV?

Over the 1-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 23.45% return vs 4.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EVSD or FDVV?

EVSD is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FDVV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EVSD or FDVV?

EVSD has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 2.72% for FDVV.

What is the main difference between EVSD and FDVV?

EVSD is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while FDVV is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Eaton Vance and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for EVSD and 0.29% for FDVV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EVSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.