EVO.TO vs. ONEQ.TO
EVO.TO (Evovest Global Equity ETF) and ONEQ.TO (CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EVO.TO returned 2.29% vs 26.29% for ONEQ.TO. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EVO.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EVO.TO achieves a 13.09% return, which is significantly higher than ONEQ.TO's 12.41% return.
EVO.TO
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 4.32%
- YTD
- 13.09%
- 6M
- 12.64%
- 1Y
- 2.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ONEQ.TO
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- YTD
- 12.41%
- 6M
- 12.14%
- 1Y
- 26.29%
- 3Y*
- 21.18%
- 5Y*
- 12.91%
- 10Y*
- 12.40%
EVO.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EVO.TO Evovest Global Equity ETF | 13.09% | 4.38% | 1.04% |
ONEQ.TO CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF | 12.41% | 17.62% | 11.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between EVO.TO and ONEQ.TO is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2024 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EVO.TO vs. ONEQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
EVO.TO
ONEQ.TO
EVO.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evovest Global Equity ETF (EVO.TO) and CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF (ONEQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EVO.TO | ONEQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.47 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.12 | 4.08 | -3.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.25 | 18.06 | -17.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EVO.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EVO.TO drawdown since its inception was -19.36%, smaller than the maximum ONEQ.TO drawdown of -34.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVO.TO and ONEQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EVO.TO | ONEQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.36% | -34.40% | +15.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.36% | -6.66% | -12.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.35% | -1.58% | -4.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.81% | -3.71% | -1.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.35% | 1.50% | +7.85% |
Volatility
EVO.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
Evovest Global Equity ETF (EVO.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF (ONEQ.TO) at 3.68%. This indicates that EVO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ONEQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EVO.TO | ONEQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.95% | 3.68% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.53% | 9.89% | +0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.97% | 11.89% | +9.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.83% | 13.27% | +6.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.83% | 13.93% | +5.90% |
Dividends
EVO.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
EVO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than ONEQ.TO's 1.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVO.TO Evovest Global Equity ETF | 0.59% | 0.67% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ONEQ.TO CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF | 1.62% | 1.60% | 1.05% | 1.53% | 1.38% | 0.89% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 0.94% | 1.03% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EVO.TO and ONEQ.TO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: National Bank Investments and CI.
Find the right allocation for EVO.TO and ONEQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer