EVMO vs. FTSD
EVMO (Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF) and FTSD (Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF) are both Mortgage Backed Securities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. EVMO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FTSD.
Performance
EVMO vs. FTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EVMO achieves a 0.65% return, which is significantly lower than FTSD's 1.24% return.
EVMO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- 6M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FTSD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- 6M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- 3.75%
- 3Y*
- 5.00%
- 5Y*
- 2.57%
- 10Y*
- 2.10%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.80%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.64M | $3.32M | $3.09M | |
| $2.17M | $2.80M | $2.13M |
EVMO vs. FTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EVMO Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF | 0.65% | 3.37% |
FTSD Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF | 1.24% | 2.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between EVMO and FTSD is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EVMO vs. FTSD — Risk / Return Rank
EVMO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FTSD
EVMO vs. FTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF (EVMO) and Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EVMO | FTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.58 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 8.64 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 32.41 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EVMO vs. FTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EVMO drawdown since its inception was -1.89%, smaller than the maximum FTSD drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVMO and FTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EVMO | FTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.89% | -5.32% | +3.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -4.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.99% | 0.00% | -0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.45% | -0.60% | +0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.12% | — |
Volatility
EVMO vs. FTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EVMO | FTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.90% | 1.36% | +1.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.90% | 1.87% | +1.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.90% | 1.76% | +1.14% |
EVMO vs. FTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
EVMO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FTSD's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
EVMO vs. FTSD - Dividend Comparison
EVMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, more than FTSD's 4.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVMO Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF | 4.99% | 1.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTSD Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF | 4.05% | 4.67% | 4.75% | 4.14% | 1.73% | 1.01% | 1.54% | 2.90% | 2.63% | 2.24% | 1.92% | 1.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EVMO and FTSD have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTSD is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTSD is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EVMO.
EVMO has the higher dividend yield at 4.99%, compared with 4.05% for FTSD.
They also come from different issuers: Eaton Vance and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for EVMO and 0.25% for FTSD.
Find the right allocation for EVMO and FTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer