EVMBX vs. MUC
EVMBX (Eaton Vance AMT-Free Municipal Income Fund) and MUC (BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, EVMBX returned 2.10%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for MUC. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EVMBX charges 0.54%/yr vs 2.14%/yr for MUC.
Performance
EVMBX vs. MUC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EVMBX achieves a 2.52% return, which is significantly lower than MUC's 7.01% return. Over the past 10 years, EVMBX has outperformed MUC with an annualized return of 2.10%, while MUC has yielded a comparatively lower 0.90% annualized return.
EVMBX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 0.92%
- YTD
- 2.52%
- 6M
- 2.52%
- 1Y
- 6.71%
- 3Y*
- 4.10%
- 5Y*
- 0.69%
- 10Y*
- 2.10%
MUC
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 2.74%
- YTD
- 7.01%
- 6M
- 7.01%
- 1Y
- 12.85%
- 3Y*
- 6.17%
- 5Y*
- -2.38%
- 10Y*
- 0.90%
EVMBX vs. MUC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVMBX Eaton Vance AMT-Free Municipal Income Fund | 2.52% | 3.63% | 2.15% | 7.47% | -11.74% | 2.13% | 5.35% | 8.47% | 1.43% | 5.15% |
MUC BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund | 7.01% | 5.96% | 0.76% | 7.86% | -26.81% | 7.38% | 11.85% | 18.12% | -9.00% | 6.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between EVMBX and MUC is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 1998 | 0.27 |
Over the past year, EVMBX and MUC have become more correlated (0.47) than their long-term average of 0.27, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EVMBX vs. MUC — Risk / Return Rank
EVMBX
MUC
EVMBX vs. MUC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance AMT-Free Municipal Income Fund (EVMBX) and BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EVMBX | MUC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.30 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | 1.98 | +0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.95 | 8.02 | +0.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EVMBX vs. MUC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EVMBX drawdown since its inception was -36.09%, smaller than the maximum MUC drawdown of -48.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVMBX and MUC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EVMBX | MUC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.09% | -48.97% | +12.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.51% | -6.53% | +4.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.52% | -14.51% | +6.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.73% | -38.29% | +21.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.73% | -38.29% | +21.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -14.13% | +14.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.78% | -9.92% | +5.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 1.61% | -0.84% |
Volatility
EVMBX vs. MUC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance AMT-Free Municipal Income Fund (EVMBX) is 0.56%, while BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC) has a volatility of 2.02%. This indicates that EVMBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EVMBX | MUC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.56% | 2.02% | -1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.12% | 6.30% | -4.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86% | 8.19% | -5.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.77% | 11.51% | -6.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.62% | 11.90% | -7.28% |
EVMBX vs. MUC - Expense Ratio Comparison
EVMBX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than MUC's 2.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
EVMBX vs. MUC - Dividend Comparison
EVMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, less than MUC's 5.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVMBX Eaton Vance AMT-Free Municipal Income Fund | 4.01% | 5.01% | 4.52% | 3.69% | 3.31% | 2.79% | 3.20% | 4.24% | 3.98% | 4.10% | 4.14% | 4.23% |
MUC BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund | 5.83% | 6.06% | 5.62% | 3.84% | 5.79% | 4.27% | 3.96% | 3.90% | 4.99% | 5.14% | 5.45% | 5.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EVMBX and MUC have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MUC has higher volatility (2.02%) compared to EVMBX (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVMBX dropped -36.09% vs MUC's -48.97%.
EVMBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EVMBX and MUC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer